From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23760: 25.0.95; emacs 25.0.95 doesn't build with glibc-2.23.90 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:03:02 +0200 Message-ID: <5767B146.30902@cs.ucla.edu> References: <57660B39.5080909@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466413518 6943 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2016 09:05:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23760@debbugs.gnu.org To: Florian Weimer , Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Syn=C3=A1=C4=8Dek?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 20 11:05:06 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bEv8X-0000Pg-08 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:04:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42187 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEv8V-0005hh-08 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 05:04:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEv7l-0005Jd-BA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 05:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEv7i-0002L7-1S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 05:04:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEv7h-0002L1-UI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 05:04:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bEv7h-0005Ig-KM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 05:04:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23760 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23760-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23760.146641339320320 (code B ref 23760); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23760) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2016 09:03:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47072 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bEv6v-0005Hf-Ln for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 05:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:35204) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bEv6t-0005HT-UG for 23760@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 05:03:12 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315C51613F2; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 02:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 9jWBqqnn81u4; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 02:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D78E1613F1; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 02:03:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id wbducWSzbgBe; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 02:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (host81-220-dynamic.35-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.35.220.81]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B76F1613EA; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 02:03:04 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119815 Archived-At: On 06/20/2016 10:48 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> aren't we better off having glibc simply not declare >> __malloc_initialize_hook? > > You mean, not declare it in ? Yes, that's what I meant. > > I'm more worried about the other __ variables in the Emacs malloc. > Their in Emacs definition does not even match the one in glibc. The > difference is probably harmless, but it is fairly close to be being > broken. The intent is that __malloc_initialize_hook and the other __ variables will become inoperative in glibc, right? That is, glibc won't set or use or care about these obsolete variables. If so, we should be OK with Emacs master as-is: when it substitutes its own (even-more-obsolescent) malloc it will set and use these variables freely, and this won't collide with any glibc use.