On 2016-05-05 18:01, Richard Copley wrote: >> I think these probably felt under the usual exemption for trivial changes (ie changes that are too tiny to be copyrightable anyway AFAIU); what I'm suggesting is different: according to , the FSF can also accept public domain patches without a signed assignment. If I understand that page correctly, there would then be no limitations on your contributions, as long as they are considered "not very important" (as opposed to "trivial"). > > I'm not sure. The language there is in terms of whole programs, not > patches, so it doesn't apply here without some interpretation. Fair enough :) At this point, I think we'll need help from someone more experienced with this process. Hopefully someone on this list can step in! Clément.