From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Fenton Subject: pandoc-style citations Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 06:53:12 +0200 Message-ID: <572045B8.4070904@pressure.to> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avHU6-0002sP-Gy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:53:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avHU3-0002st-BH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:53:58 -0400 Received: from plato.servwise.com ([94.76.236.81]:49704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avHU3-0002c9-3P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:53:55 -0400 Received: from x5ce581ff.dyn.telefonica.de ([92.229.129.255]:36451 helo=[192.168.178.25]) by plato.servwise.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1avHTN-000BPr-2V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:53:13 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, I see that there were several extensive and fruitful discussions on this list last year on citation syntax. There seemed to be a reasonable degree of consensus that pandoc-style citation syntax was at the least a good model. I'd like to know if there are any implementations out there of elisp to parse pandoc citation syntax and turn it into latex \cites. My question is not so much "when/if this will be in org mode" but rather whether there's something I can drop in now (likely as a link type). I have a lot of longish citations with multiple references each with their own pre- and post- ("'blah blah blah @ref1, p.23, also @ref2, for a contrary view see @ref3 pp148-152") that end up as \cites. However my home-brew link solution, stuffing the multiple pre- and posts- with separator into the link description is unwieldy - difficult to write, hard to read and easy to get wrong or breaking output. thanks alex