Matthew Leach wrote:
> There is no specific reason other than 226 is what is installed on my
> system and what I have tested against.  If you are able to test on an
> earlier version, this number could be reduced.

Thanks. Can you please investigate which is the earliest number for which it's 
plausible that the new systemd code will work? In the meantime I installed the 
attached patch, which lists that as a FIXME and addresses the other problem I 
mentioned along with a few minor style glitches.