From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Moreton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23221: 25.0.92; Crash in redisplay during isearch Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:42:59 +0100 Message-ID: <5703DD03.7060209@gmail.com> References: <5703BD97.3060905@solarflare.com> <83wpocm7ka.fsf@gnu.org> <5703D520.4060201@gmail.com> <83mvp8m5gz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459871097 25037 80.91.229.3 (5 Apr 2016 15:44:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23221@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 17:44:47 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1anT9I-0004xD-KQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:44:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anT9I-0000An-4o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anT9C-00005w-39 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anT98-0002E4-67 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anT98-0002E0-2e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anT97-0002Vg-Qn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:44:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Moreton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23221 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23221-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23221.14598709899582 (code B ref 23221); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2016 15:43:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50527 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anT8G-0002UU-Mr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:38545) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anT8E-0002Ts-Qc for 23221@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id u206so9845372wme.1 for <23221@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:43:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7B8ryD8dzKCvmmQcMEYA99dWVLENle0eE9PtzdX1fbQ=; b=BU6tsaykMkZUpQNdi5jc91btIcjUIFWSA/DNIq5GXM3xZ2yw+dw83Ej9Cn8dz1z/TX miAu4eXiNpx2VJnGV1L5/gZE+90cNgc3XOI78ZztAYnRtMkeh92aMYPV4OhOSX7BSy4Y crUSRpbWWzMSY8utZVsYJTRHL94wbzK7kkaN955kiFl8HxH+wE9bs+e9iRPX3psWjr8s 3H1FVGMcGwxY6+svvU/XgVhG/9qw6O5bSCWAClaK/SIGSrStfqmyOg99GzaFx8tbcBTv ELmKFPdRlYsUUjuuBBpQohI4S4a1n4nA7KoP29RUhxuqg0g7oweVDwJhbQpt3m/q1PO4 0uww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7B8ryD8dzKCvmmQcMEYA99dWVLENle0eE9PtzdX1fbQ=; b=V1hY684EKM7i2jCtxx2QUG6GWKu9Vs2CcUKTDA+f031OKWS44Bxp7BvOd7dU8m8pMZ xjEOacBL2EMhXbb+pq/OfLB7T1q+sI9uMSM2MONFLIP3/7x2EwMsajtSI9fta0hgSkNP d4GkyntvqycQPoxIvsDKxKYogQWAPkaPoMoiQj63NtFi+Pb6uA7YnzLiObP8md/6rRah LPWZ3sDzq8tCxqyR6E58GMWiaghmfn9z7H/4CyUrYCdXMIwFiV3egrdDAXkSXx0IBnmF Oku1w9Es85M3wuX6QjmhcvhXhcMNHyA9Su0CCaIRnXCMRlcGU5NchLlECr/9+X0gCvT0 xMeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKsQisM+Rjqlt9o7a4UrhXJjWcFNkfPp7ySqcSpD6PKQKutEnUWP+/5PturcjoUqQ== X-Received: by 10.194.21.102 with SMTP id u6mr11979174wje.124.1459870981258; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.17.20.50] (uk.solarflare.com. [193.34.186.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b8sm35268294wjf.9.2016.04.05.08.42.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:43:00 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 In-Reply-To: <83mvp8m5gz.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116070 Archived-At: On 05/04/2016 4:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: 23221@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Andy Moreton >> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:09:20 +0100 >> >> > Did you make local changes in the 25.0.92 sources? The line numbers >> > in the backtrace make no sense; I tried both the stock 25.0.92 sources >> > and the current emacs-25 branch, and none matched. What am I missing? >> >> Strange. This was built from the emacs-25 branch without any local changes, >> at commit a05fb21d73d2ca84dd7e5e7ee931931048ecddba. The line numbers look to >> match the backtrace here - what is mismatched for you ? > > Ignore me: I must have done something wrong, because now the lines > make perfect sense. Maybe I didn't really look at the latest branch, > but at the stock 25.0.92 tarball instead. > > Anyway: it's an assertion violation, but I cannot say anything > intelligent about the reason, given the information you provided. > Emacs was in isearch, obviously (which seems to say that the articles > were already reloaded, and you invoked a search), but other than > that... Feel free to close this, as I can't reproduce it, and I don't have the crashed session open in gdb any more. AndyM