From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Understanding a recent commit in emacs-25 branch [ed19f2]
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 13:02:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570176DF.1060207@cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wpoey1ij.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Rebase should never be the default, because it is more complicated and
> harder to get right. It creates new commits that each must be retested.
Rebasing makes sense for Alan's use case. He was working on the fix anyway, so
retesting was not that big a deal for him. Conversely, he's more of an Emacs
expert than a Git expert and merge conflicts are more of an hassle for him. This
particular case did not benefit much from the advantages of merging over
rebasing; quite the contrary.
As one becomes more of a Git expert, merging becomes more attractive. It does
take some getting used to, though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-03 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-01 5:32 Understanding a recent commit in emacs-25 branch [ed19f2] Kaushal Modi
2016-04-01 5:43 ` Kaushal Modi
2016-04-01 6:43 ` Paul Eggert
2016-04-03 12:03 ` Alan Mackenzie
2016-04-03 12:10 ` Achim Gratz
2016-04-03 14:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-04-03 14:49 ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-04-03 18:15 ` Achim Gratz
2016-04-03 18:45 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-04-03 18:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-03 20:02 ` Paul Eggert [this message]
2016-04-03 21:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-04-03 23:11 ` John Wiegley
2016-04-03 12:18 ` Ingo Lohmar
2016-04-03 11:17 ` Alan Mackenzie
2016-04-03 11:27 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-04-03 11:40 ` Ingo Lohmar
2016-04-03 12:14 ` Alan Mackenzie
2016-04-03 12:30 ` Ingo Lohmar
2016-04-03 14:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-04-03 14:57 ` Ingo Lohmar
2016-04-03 15:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-04-03 15:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-03 15:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-03 15:23 ` Ingo Lohmar
2016-04-03 15:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-03 16:00 ` Ingo Lohmar
2016-04-03 16:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-03 16:24 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-04-03 17:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-03 17:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-04-03 18:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-03 11:44 ` Dmitry Gutov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570176DF.1060207@cs.ucla.edu \
--to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.