From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23465: 25.0.93; `lambda' after hash-quote not highlighted as keyword Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 01:09:50 +0300 Message-ID: <56d56c19-466b-9aaa-c7a3-18c95c848091@yandex.ru> References: <83zirxc22i.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462918228 20455 80.91.229.3 (10 May 2016 22:10:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 22:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23465@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Anders Lindgren Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 11 00:10:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Fr6-0006r5-9R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 00:10:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49392 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Fr5-00086I-HM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 18:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Fqx-0007vn-2A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 18:10:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Fqr-0004s8-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 18:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Fqr-0004s4-RY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 18:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Fqr-0001jy-O2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 18:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 22:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23465 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23465-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23465.14629181996679 (code B ref 23465); Tue, 10 May 2016 22:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23465) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2016 22:09:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46391 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Fqp-0001je-Jj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 18:09:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:38605) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Fqn-0001jR-Il for 23465@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2016 18:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id g17so51380164wme.1 for <23465@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=amH2yc/lnPu8LMZ+UEMW3et1bNdcW3A+0FU+0O0IIic=; b=npF8VPSWSZmoSkBOlQBgG4JoHU7cL7f/gXS9yk3R9LcIQ+ptBzDJSx6XcO9UGheLSV a4GNTWv6Ys2Jsk3ixEQFSfPvej0cTeAuY+P0p4FT4uSyh2M5Ij1SeQ8fJw/Wgr1RhH4W y3WsSBxGe5pHa9kG8WMlTDN97xZHlGHbrlmUyDZmKyJploYj+Z2fJiek1CVdjlgXG9H4 ZSKI4nq7W4ixa3uYxoZ1Rs4CIBYSvgVhYHifvfnm/oL6wBMtiScnM5w6UNPaKIF4VcJN pjF9sXormymfeHZck8YQJe694PxzGCFt57PXeu+/Nnt1K+LZdfnwiBM/vL0t1hSjpN4K Jclg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=amH2yc/lnPu8LMZ+UEMW3et1bNdcW3A+0FU+0O0IIic=; b=gzs3ckW8kJipv7PJngUUXh9uXJKf+MrEKFQe+7a8TfpsSAaSvRLgCbBOkcApPIMmbR gYgtOUP46aOxuku131osAHjdhyMmrUeNqUprqef4FKSZVSAVu1/WQYexUB3ATAdwtVt7 2B182ZSHVqlQRlWDC2siqexzFpuclpSIX9mm7SdaG3V0lyUeHUomtu9TaEkSkCov0LsV 6t0ByrpmjXzGZZsaNDpO9SePY48Gm8am0oil0QaUGGhKO79atgn6PmC+fvvr2R6MzOcs KSkRTl5ufspI4vaP1CVnMHecO0VjCPOvq9A38qaTRODyYgLHXVvF42pjBmwZ+iHN/DMK EwGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUppf0pzhs2SXr9vk3mx28guqU478FmojfgDAv/8N++ZRLYZlGZqaOMgQtMSXRA2A== X-Received: by 10.194.248.135 with SMTP id ym7mr41612265wjc.174.1462918191990; Tue, 10 May 2016 15:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i194sm32355671wmf.6.2016.05.10.15.09.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 May 2016 15:09:51 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1 In-Reply-To: <83zirxc22i.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118092 Archived-At: On 05/10/2016 07:25 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Sorry, I don't know anything about that code, and don't consider > myself an expert on font-lock enough to judge this suggestion. I hope > someone else will chime in. FWIW, LGTM. But should we encourage this use of sharp quotes? There is no need to quote lambdas; sharp quote doesn't hurt, but is there a case where it would help with a lambda? As an aside, it would be great if we could get rid of the duplication between lisp--el-non-funcall-position-p vs elisp--form-quoted-p, elisp--expect-function-p and some bits inside elisp-completion-at-point. Or reduce it, at least.