From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should minibuffer prompt be made intangible by default? (Was debbugs 21874: 25.0.50; point-entered no longer works) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:04:14 +0200 Message-ID: <56FD9EDE.2010207@gmail.com> References: <56FD5468.1070609@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CECeLVuhiuG8IBXfsFcd1fxldA9kaWPEf" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459461889 11179 80.91.229.3 (31 Mar 2016 22:04:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:04:49 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 00:04:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1alkhf-0001eg-Py for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:04:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34691 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alkhf-00014e-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:04:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alkhR-00014Z-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alkhN-0001op-7o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:60480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alkhM-0001ol-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:04:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.82] ([109.24.225.43]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOj82-1agmLY2yTm-0063yC for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:04:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:SPU1SF+ynBIWA3NddtoR/n8hm65G1JY2VD3R3s9iKSmk6Ml3Le1 hW4l6Kgus7WGMzVAVlFbHA5/0zGBoYXMUThvPa5IBt6FgMZ2nYehLrjPJKlypSWDkYYmzZQ rYIBcQ2Gq7mF7pWc6jDragOaXD0BX8xveYRdBLV48p2iisxarTToa3dCwH6Gv25UbquydyO tGnKuJHFGcy9XIL7PsDzQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Ij6taCHQPhw=:WjApWRHgTJPOATrYTQUvI7 oTdBDRS4T2i54o4aRuU7beaVK4bi4JSdEBAor44AzF8RAwvC5T1d509ZBoMbhcnQBYPgAEo7Y +mxr0mkGe9Innu0NEHTeE+5g9wIEVHH+CZQlA72pZTUrRd7FoRiDVBb52W7NB4thWOTdi/fqG 8yyoc2VaupZxdFjPjNxmVF34C4GO/fLeA/MBTDI3TfGbh5Xiew317ov2CdzuMmi/M69jDzUDW v/FyhA0FWsqrWu5c8SUSo3O1N2xEUFvyKtgSHAVPi+klS3c3rNMJ8r4BTyG2AEpEdDFaeHBoW PlZydVoUbfP0KYEQ58kN/WMIKWykpGrkfj7tEhfG16m6lMPzhTIwQOiS6fRWZW/Ie3ogMB++3 t6W8Fl3D3cfF/3rLMO5PYo/thyYT2Pb6VxMd1Kl7Cd7yn2X7T5fE9hIcgusiOZddvEdNDuTPk 13RpECvzzLuRk6KWWXpDHnvx5+HhAImB6UFvM8zEnNVt+SHkJGleLb9m5mE9Z3Kau13Vkqaw2 oR1r53WxdbzNNbUFuiHmFDCsD0DnDbegiidbGgf3xqCv1SNMBMYb3azhrWLu8W1qaZnib5WQ+ Ly86+XvHF37t3hMeKk8piayUZCy3LotKiptMsTTku1qZu4v/KG29MqSaTQx8GSekhYFSwbcK9 FM6klE/FxT323eh1Jv1dHdrYs X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 217.72.192.74 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202541 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --CECeLVuhiuG8IBXfsFcd1fxldA9kaWPEf Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Jlac196icp1ep1f2Fo2ncpBsojMpIWq1E" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <56FD9EDE.2010207@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Should minibuffer prompt be made intangible by default? (Was debbugs 21874: 25.0.50; point-entered no longer works) References: <56FD5468.1070609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: --Jlac196icp1ep1f2Fo2ncpBsojMpIWq1E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/31/2016 11:37 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > (tho, admittedly, currently our story for Elisp-level customization of > faces is rather poor, so for those I think that Custom is the only > reasonable option). Thanks! Faces are one of the thing I *don't* use custom for. AFAIK it doe= s not let you create and manipulate fontsets; I don't think we have any w= ay to specify these properly, in fact. At least, the question at https://= emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/17205/how-do-i-set-up-font-fallback-in-= a-robust-way didn't get a single answer.=20 --Jlac196icp1ep1f2Fo2ncpBsojMpIWq1E-- --CECeLVuhiuG8IBXfsFcd1fxldA9kaWPEf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJW/Z7eAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjx+gP/0av1cJBkszvBukSQGbEytIL Ssw7YDUtqi3+wpYykLVAmqr3zUfkuQA6+7jumliMD2B1B4si6FFuycyIkO/mKHeH Lr0xNPpJSVG3SsAIZ03kWfo9Xx2iDRcx14Va8xnw1l6Ekqx3hK5hB1Tp+YrWOesC hVsH9RuSYSZOWQERsudwaOUAAmzW4QQo9OcrKFZPNiYQ4GZogSl+SQj/yoz4GO9d 6fIrzIo445bDAYc8FZA9barFNTr/HNKIg2625JEKHY/C1raAmR2SPws0oTYEu/7Z VYffvGGf0YsE9Q3qLlx+L3vOXfH8CXngKhrWvpgUNX0lj4Tlf9TyUJkYyrMsq1yM UoCX9STqTAHCE/FNv7VZi1GtgX56Hu9NgKoERxzGm2mWzdnms92ow58f0jW/wt6I M9sM7bUdwAohdyGNf0KSmQVJcvAz7xamU9y/vIG9FnlQC5CmXHaJnJ6pJK5ViZmy evWFsSjP1jwWID8Xp896+oemwmJ/sgukD14fmhqlqtFLYnlyCyv0tFby5D7tRJGV AtPJgxD++RvAlg3P8s+U7T7ABqXn28wtWSOqQevWcUscjjpcPg4fiDDA0rplbHOW zw/YZKNKz99LntzRh0Lx8RxQi/EoVWK/GkVDF89jOlqKijFps8eZ2JpODo59aepV 0hD4sol+IQjEFKk51I49 =E3L5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CECeLVuhiuG8IBXfsFcd1fxldA9kaWPEf--