From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: What to do when font-lock-flush + font-lock-ensure do less than font-lock-fontify-buffer? Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:55:04 -0500 Message-ID: <56CA94A8.3000205@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tfbfkeDuDe1K0SQceavFGnFRqqNnLCUVm" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456116939 6564 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2016 04:55:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 04:55:39 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 22 05:55:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aXiWv-0002wS-J2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:55:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46999 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXiWu-00079Y-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:55:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59635) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXiWe-000793-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:55:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXiWb-0002XB-0n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:55:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:64920) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXiWa-0002Wm-NY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:55:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.189.69.235] ([18.189.69.235]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoMna-1a01bM0q7O-00gUGc for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 05:55:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Yi0s2G0QCWwvqfmrRoR3NnPDz+/ZfeeJ4vk+byc4BAtbJ15edYk O+xRzNJ45iDHGKGTxaT6tGXJ0mdojQBvPsfu6RjSgKcW8a5IzH2XrpAaQ9h6nIIjaTilcTR haNVdXOE+aFgicaLBM7fJ8VPeBh84biCECwMUJsLsffiqjXiPJkTfxDF7r43UE9AajmJqVN FQufpjIkkMu9g9MrJ4tbQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hyaBvFb5Sek=:yussE9yHnt/NKFGXQdnHTu 1x9Os8BLbGFWOaMmpYu/EF9L+51oxE2GcelbOJZkIQt5gCmq/6y0jYjBjcH2pkv5W8NNPv1VV RizWGK1Eu01eECtOvPp9PtZQh+PxAcThPuIgM8EEcXINLoZll4HlmbSUMZ7lNxMyQxFP4egsB JDPgJ4H+pLdp8UqeR2YxMf34d3tVwqHyN3ygRVFNuvubojyuqnpaVXrNGioWfmHWKxlq7YhRh vSB1l9wlDeBUoiNSCRISIR7kjjGjrr4YHMcEQWsw32AcReHTYQ9JIjItjrNBY5BoIsd31dgmd bpp526mmqlvkUa0bhZNlreqxLVXOhwJ0CIS8bkf6tdj5HFwdc8hBQ9KzyvEzETEeuj13iFJoI KJ0oHiSSeCgUDQMmpojmvLLc+uGpHjduEhP+jHvZKfQkFr08SRLgbAZP1cUlO3Im1qjNY4Idp mj40bxHlbRkXWlYGWL5za+y6+cARehrl54BR+tmFzlbPxOr7dQimo6D5fTEi7/ASuy6l3kL3E +h3XZ/HVlU0xBkMRI1vNe33rmMP4UhAn5ybOBO38obTe+wGdbOZqTOiVZFgueHuCuTd4JgktS iI4v0ZAP6EYvBFsP9b+56ymUtlr1cUQxf4mnUsjU40l99xtMMojznqbjhhx5e+ZzKTg4FauML KshyEYVdadhkQj7BjX2hLT1h1A3dg8OhPqY7mQvTDSCYEEByh3UL/rYooImRELHZlb+E= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.187 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200436 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --tfbfkeDuDe1K0SQceavFGnFRqqNnLCUVm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi emacs-devel, IIUC the proper way in Emacs 25 to signal changes that require a refontif= ication to font-lock is to call font-lock-flush. This doesn't always do a= s much as font-lock-fontify-buffer does, though. In particular, when the font-lock-fontified variable is nil (which does h= appen, though I don't know why; I don't know what this variable is for), = then calling font-lock-fontify buffer does refontify the whole buffer, bu= t font-lock-flush and font-lock-ensure don't seem to do anything. What's the proper way to mark a buffer for refontification (and refontify= the visible portion) immediately in 25? Thanks, Cl=C3=A9ment. --tfbfkeDuDe1K0SQceavFGnFRqqNnLCUVm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWypSoAAoJEPqg+cTm90wj+ToP/37g94nUQ/6UAZtcNMQ0hThg 48ZlQrnx3icl05P9kOZK1OT/fqE5g//W2957JEIay+ISJtjgCTwW2ps4StTFLppc A/HiJ9YCLZAHwjnyXd4fiAj4r/qbYBaToXbHa7dX0lci/Q87km0jt+Ca3FIMbSmV WyKL69FfF+uM5ZNEEyiCvbHf7xB3EaRlLzHJPFtkvvkfV+iydgSeNzuBFsjNp0fZ p69LdsBDQbl1Lbgoa6sKEPX7ihDeiUBB+buUtqtRDAR9YLIxuD4ClxLrJh0SeI9S N7mnKP3Zdhyd4Cz4cw4y2Zgmqv7ykHUZnH+PR+k6NxovguyR9/uTB+enhqAsEMTw McBqYmJrkKVvF/nqzR6hsej0M6rxNTXpDrH8YaZS6xuRJZT4CxUx6wNzw/wl1rp4 CwuPBk0RCK9PixVLdWIn6PxvzhTNFK39riWYr0RtQUdpDRFudKUG2q4DGrcFXxLd Zqd14P9ah1gxs+B3SqbXH8xk15ib8ePoMAkf19oOJykklYV71kWhtMaQL5h6jGWC CpICn0ynnIEYpAm2VP9lL14jcMIlHJyxL+dlsb2CMc6neWxZEFXBtcVgga0e+pDd GOnzKWG0gmJ/+SDy8YlIXj6K6WYxEmAICvTMEdEIRG3FvRoJ1AzC5uEpyn1eVcBw DjGVhlrsZ7SpfJKIZjRp =rQEZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tfbfkeDuDe1K0SQceavFGnFRqqNnLCUVm--