From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22692: 25.0.91; xref-find-definitions fails to prompt Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:08:37 +0200 Message-ID: <56C75A25.3090506@yandex.ru> References: <23698.1455674128@allegro.localdomain> <56C71C1D.8010502@yandex.ru> <83r3g8r8qz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455905365 24167 80.91.229.3 (19 Feb 2016 18:09:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22692@debbugs.gnu.org, m.kupfer@acm.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 19:09:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpUM-0001rM-LY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:09:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54382 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpUL-00038c-Us for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:09:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpUI-00037T-4s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:09:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpUE-0002Ne-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:09:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpUE-0002NR-0K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpUD-0006jB-OH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:09:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22692 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22692-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22692.145590532825840 (code B ref 22692); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 18:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22692) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2016 18:08:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpTz-0006ih-R8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:08:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:36607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aWpTy-0006iU-2G for 22692@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:08:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id g62so88555079wme.1 for <22692@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:08:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UIoqg7J/EJFOfltSYbm3DNSEhpxa471JFBeJehqpkTw=; b=QfTD0lULBFRuGgp7zMEJMNZ3MRJHwGQP/60mwn1vxRGelaS1sOVaN6Uio7X6IUqvvr 3R+XMIUz1NCgVOaBowUuz5udXCv91hp0gUWzzEIYN1m0jEncwa2RYbgserLJJ+sEGMSp cD3zPInc2p96Qk023PA+mzHYtSlXL29KuKsHCLfUZSgiJG71G1GHJZVhMjGNnHYjlgGu tbf/vL81LLgOclmbxgGxNrMuw+0+Uf4zlRlwO+gbxVb9lHMWLqsVpsqse+M+CcN5db7n c97NcknQPAE084LW2Gjn2bs8gpDk7UWFCzIdfAvXXfdnqfZfF2aUqErLMeRMxegJn98s roZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UIoqg7J/EJFOfltSYbm3DNSEhpxa471JFBeJehqpkTw=; b=g/yqUHzau4EvESEgPo2p7s3okMDYfLABCJ+d+le5Atu8/O+dm4zv8dQ4RreqcB615c OLvnuChV6TQTsq5jMVTvm/nYUtdGHCp07dEQiXMNKE/yAji4P4aNA/fXWDfOVcujWcDY 33xKWpX4kahJLYdM3vCUnlsQVzCnW8TVVkkxbU5wkdOWAzewN118rxQqzW8fHR6GGj/C y/HCaC9yws9nUcdfVFF+OgUqRlvYeURWmfR1+62eEhe6JiBG5R/pU7khD/EGwNW2XNF8 En2UX+aJaETIETlYvR1pINE3pUXb3qrXdOsNU//nyNf2ru3ppmQMYVlz62mUbL5AFm9O 518A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQ6oK/fCc4iDY3FYSXYi9JrWbiFZAp2WLTBHh5mkZh9KwFmx9FBGOVP1JQpXRcobA== X-Received: by 10.194.92.68 with SMTP id ck4mr14304343wjb.144.1455905320385; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:08:40 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.185] ([212.50.99.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b5sm8670416wmh.15.2016.02.19.10.08.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:08:39 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0 In-Reply-To: <83r3g8r8qz.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113306 Archived-At: On 02/19/2016 05:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > It is a valid use case to try to find out whether a symbol already has > some definition. In that case, saying "no definition" is what the > user will expect for an undefined symbol, so asking for a symbol will > confuse. Then we don't need to change anything there, do we? >> We probably should just remove the word "valid" from there. > > That depends on how you will change the behavior ;-) Zero change is best change. :-)