From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22207: emacs-25 mishandles info code text on Fedora 23 Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:33:32 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <56BF76FC.9070102@cs.ucla.edu> References: <56744F95.20307@cs.ucla.edu> <83a8p7wnos.fsf@gnu.org> <2psi2zh70k.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <9yfuyy9rlo.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8337uyutvn.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4cqtdx9.fsf@gnu.org> <8j37uxss6v.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83twndt99s.fsf@gnu.org> <56771A3B.7050309@cs.ucla.edu> <83d1tzsrkp.fsf@gnu.org> <56BE86E3.6000905@cs.ucla.edu> <8337sx6lf9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455388463 13798 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2016 18:34:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22207@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 13 19:34:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUf1I-0003oP-4I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:34:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44057 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUf1H-0007zo-8h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:34:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUf1D-0007ze-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUf18-0007v3-P5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:34:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUf18-0007uz-Lf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aUf18-00014J-Db for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22207 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22207-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22207.14553884214076 (code B ref 22207); Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2016 18:33:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38302 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aUf0m-00013g-VF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:33:41 -0500 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:52691) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aUf0l-00013T-GW for 22207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:33:40 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CB2160504; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:33:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 7Ce5P1RFkUeC; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:33:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CE9160FC1; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:33:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id GkyK8smOtV6j; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:33:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-100-32-155-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [100.32.155.148]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 510B3160504; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:33:32 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 In-Reply-To: <8337sx6lf9.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112984 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > if your default font is already monospaced, what would you expect > from Info-quoted face to produce? I thought the result which you > describe is exactly what was wanted in this case. IIRC, we had that > before the change that introduced this face. Sorry, you're right; I forgot about the old behavior. Ideally code would be in a different monospaced font, one that is readable. Perhaps a bolder font, say. So the change was an improvement in that it uses a different monospaced font, but it's a disimprovement in that the different font is irritatingly small.