From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_R=c3=b6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Regression WRT newline? Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:25:41 +0100 Message-ID: <56B99475.80605@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455002753 10211 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2016 07:25:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:25:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 08:25:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aT2gC-0006ZR-SY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:25:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52694 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT2gB-0002q5-Q2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:25:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT2fo-0002of-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:25:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT2fj-0007tG-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:63037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT2fj-0007sw-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 02:25:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([77.6.198.36]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue005) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWvfk-1aYchS0qJA-00W1m1 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:25:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7++E9/B1QAaC7sxZwoCtbwjnaOJjNVVjQwjnvlDi7WZWlKkrQGP czN5ZCteoMATYTgj5N+v6kFzocakn1I8wSnkNxNcko3x5/VlcT976Sjfoy3VPt1dCz7WkhH qKCA0uYSz1rZmX3hhsG0B+icksesiiPKGUaJl+kTmSVUpDhgf+oam5kMkNTfoffnVaE4xqB thQps/QEeIx2iBcvOecdA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Sh2v5Egdlw4=:TCv+Fjl2b0dFtZu1iVenHe CWOLJ6Tx0VMzaGTb2QAy7NVfgNUIBUYNXhM8n8yiU79PL0DLh8yrAMoaS4l48nTzD4avGOacX StMoPi03peZbv+b7tqZFURcIa60tKqPChauaJFzmEoSf/Wn0OmSquN5AJ//x2ErqXgsYTqd/4 OroRaTt6/1JCyysd4Kq6wGF2SO8g03T5k3yh4EY/zmDYjSkgaPFRS21wU1S5nR1o4oaLvtOtJ wY1o0F8KKxtuP7mEGceQM1SYY29T51rf3nW/i96F3XpHbI1w8AvSdpA0vjRkEieclNWeqygWt R4N/gt+79CiTRgy9ryFQjH/DMjaFZCMlbym08cn0fvWfZYBAs1t3xIbShiSYWMSRsgwOMjQjm Vr2NqxG+hoJpaMYgCeOAPNo4hhaA+2gDf9AZEyVvtpfcQSQQkaQg5YrvT0qxD4Dlx1wSi+Rv1 ThLpr+1956szsSgAq94fgY5nyRlM1vAbM33x969lZORJnJO6wDlPumZk8fZCcJnhYsy9TLxKv w+OgxDQejglOOQsUX9VEohp/4JPgzAeTr2kF9DEemdlqu5yhBIWImxaGlJg/U6ngZPbvp3rJq XB1tFG2rnVjEdGTz86Sv15VLfuzfvwdwMP6SV8nPPJCYzdZ9pKzlFlEeenQ926mzNq1J+r/9s wdH1Qyl6S7GG2qlX0VMHk1DwsCdHy+4zq7qxjyedHHWJ3Tt59B+OveU4yGbZVlvzn8lWTOxAS 0fWdXY1Vha4IvQWv X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.134 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199577 Archived-At: Command newline from simple.el has the following comment: ;; FIXME: For non-interactive uses, many calls actually just want ;; (insert "\n"), so maybe we should do just that, so as to avoid ;; the risk of filling or running abbrevs unexpectedly. IIRC in earlier times, on windows for example an additional "\r" was required. Then using (newline) instead of simply (insert "\n") was recommended. This would not help anymore. Just to bring it to your attention, Andreas