From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Konstantin Kharlamov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Significant Garbage Collection Improvement For Emacs" - sweep_conses performance improved by 50%? Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:07:20 +0300 Message-ID: <569e9e115ef38c3aeb53e4108430ef50357438d9.camel@yandex.ru> References: <871qqr425n.fsf@yahoo.com> <42ba5e8a-8a26-4afd-ab59-efbb967e8a24@app.fastmail.com> <874jrsufoa.fsf@localhost> <7bd78a657e0d21c2efb81bcdedb9d8bdbb018776.camel@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39404"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.3 Cc: Po Lu , Stefan Kangas , Emacs developers To: Ihor Radchenko , Tyler Dodge Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 21:08:02 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pRf7K-000A41-GN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:08:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRf6n-0005IX-QG; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:07:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRf6m-0005IN-Iz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:07:28 -0500 Original-Received: from forward501b.mail.yandex.net ([2a02:6b8:c02:900:1:45:d181:d501]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRf6k-0006fU-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 15:07:28 -0500 Original-Received: from iva3-dd2bb2ff2b5f.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva3-dd2bb2ff2b5f.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0c:7611:0:640:dd2b:b2ff]) by forward501b.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DA4D55EC36; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:07:22 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: by iva3-dd2bb2ff2b5f.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id L7psST3YAqM1-ogH4RQDG; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:07:21 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1676318841; bh=e874aOpWRG1ghv1LlHzZPrVVa4YI8CSyYH55MaM4Tg4=; h=References:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; b=nQm8Kz+3XPFG4DfMibY96J8eMf6/QLgYAxhoHvOK8JFjrsLYLsFSH+7Rnfscq6dwT MzmHVEHH/1SP+eMEqPYnTdyF5QapJna1n6c4C4TnvAFRUGdSBUYoNfKlEMpi86hGGM nl7mu5HqGENLIQe/m+JP2KjgeW8AEIGL78CIG/GQ= Authentication-Results: iva3-dd2bb2ff2b5f.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru In-Reply-To: <7bd78a657e0d21c2efb81bcdedb9d8bdbb018776.camel@yandex.ru> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:6b8:c02:900:1:45:d181:d501; envelope-from=hi-angel@yandex.ru; helo=forward501b.mail.yandex.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303232 Archived-At: On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 00:58 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 20:10 +0000, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > So, yeah, nice change. No idea why it's been 3 months and nobody picked i= t up > =F0=9F=A4=B7=E2=80=8D=E2=99=82=EF=B8=8F Tho now that I looked at it, I ma= y as well create a patch from it and > send > for review. Unless there's opposition, I'm planning on doing so tomorrow. >=20 > Thank you Ihor for pinging (I didn't see this thread) and Stefan for the > initial > posting of the article here! So, a day later, as promised, patch sent! Yay^^ https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D61490