From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 f8208b6: Document the user-level features of the Xref package Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:53:19 +0300 Message-ID: <569EB04F.800@yandex.ru> References: <20160109191428.26341.44105@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <5691C9D2.7080905@yandex.ru> <83egdpmo1j.fsf@gnu.org> <56929D6F.2050508@yandex.ru> <834melmfa4.fsf@gnu.org> <5692B1E0.8010100@yandex.ru> <831t9pma4e.fsf@gnu.org> <5693FDFA.2070607@yandex.ru> <83ziwbkj5l.fsf@gnu.org> <5694055E.6050201@yandex.ru> <83si1udcaz.fsf@gnu.org> <569D64AC.1060606@yandex.ru> <83powxbh6c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453240428 27788 80.91.229.3 (19 Jan 2016 21:53:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 19 22:53:43 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aLeDf-00025n-AY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:53:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39354 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLeDb-0007A2-9j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:53:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLeDN-00078t-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:53:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLeDK-0000jJ-NK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]:35446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLeDK-0000j0-A3; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:53:22 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c192so347777922lfe.2; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:53:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QOJdDbBSs1JTHB0RKbigi9Wmn1Tqb+Cgvx1eklfjw54=; b=xjAizCGcm4rgAj2vKeSGPre1GxT4m18PRf6MwlSm10xRNO35Pj7KNeN7poJwUYzyku XinlZHtURS30VVGtJHH/WNzadFWCo91hqq14yH8199EuYy55Akui83Fw5aZQYNemeIYe OMX1/1paQ/n33vOUQBvRSqegqlFZ+k5Kv23ojSOsXxPlPh/u/vKXk9+l+JPXjLKc8dWM Xutm90/5VDPzl0AfTM9ZhI4WOM9BQJrbVpCXLGQJaIvcv+BZAcLl648FufsLUrS9g7yG lLCpkPxd98R89jXvYkLxaIrIEeiKVSyVxCj2EcI+c4w82QtkTFhgXIYqQiNYWHRn8JsK /k8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QOJdDbBSs1JTHB0RKbigi9Wmn1Tqb+Cgvx1eklfjw54=; b=KxmkJkdeX4PWU0/NDXIFO3XWxLEPDkvW3gFvTj5P/+5lylQl0veC8ZCCl6yVlVgX/4 LQsuBh3zeTk7ORauY4hx07eoewUL05n00XTIbh0qT3SXL81vUQUiyDm5i2EvV/jGrn+t wloLJuQBPUIGnFeI/nJL64kOy6ZFDFLN4700xTQwnwMGjOilbEqMFHGeDVxpxZBn664e izZgk9LeKMT39CJJNJcLVm3yfMXc5AKQMKWiueYSboSVWoDsUXBPp00VPoILP+gkhH97 Kj9YNtgowBAwnZGMPAfg/x8iitUCFMFiA7K6MO0VtmL5S3T98rVqyBtlJ3lZafUzX795 FB7A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJ+D04CGQOL1uOGaME9ws4hAxa9+JD3t8vfExOA0QGS4J6hxz85QCEs6cLkiaXs+3EB3NlxuNrVtqTesHnra9AXHar5w== X-Received: by 10.25.5.205 with SMTP id 196mr11906185lff.143.1453240400898; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:53:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p66sm4336693lfe.42.2016.01.19.13.53.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:53:19 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/44.0 In-Reply-To: <83powxbh6c.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198400 Archived-At: On 01/19/2016 08:41 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Some of the discussion we had before was about the structure of this > section. You cannot see the structure from the diffs, which is why I > suggested to read the formatted manual. Yes, but I didn't offer any particular opinion on that. It seems good enough, although I'd remove, or move out, the references to etags commands: the section is named Xref, tags-* commands are not part of it. With the two new additions, we could feel more confident doing that. There's no direct counterpart to tags-search, but I think it can be adequately replaced with dired-do-find-regexp or project-or-external-find-regexp. > In any case, changing terminology in that subsection means a serious > rewrite of it in its entirety. I see no reason for such an effort. I > moved the offending sentence to a footnote (with some explanation why > we change terminology in this subsection), so people who already know > what "tag" is will need not stumble upon this. Fair enough. Thanks for considering it.