From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 21:46:49 +0300 Message-ID: <5697ED19.9010001@yandex.ru> References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> <5691795E.9010008@yandex.ru> <83lh7ym725.fsf@gnu.org> <5691D768.3020908@yandex.ru> <83bn8tmnvq.fsf@gnu.org> <56928356.2000609@yandex.ru> <8360z1mkfc.fsf@gnu.org> <5696EE9D.2090708@yandex.ru> <838u3si22k.fsf@gnu.org> <5697C7A8.6060601@yandex.ru> <83wprcgjxk.fsf@gnu.org> <5697DA3B.3070706@yandex.ru> <5697DD56.4010905@yandex.ru> <83h9iggga5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452797235 24987 80.91.229.3 (14 Jan 2016 18:47:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 19:47:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmvM-0000x7-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:47:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44176 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmvM-0006dd-4E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:47:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmv8-0006dK-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:46:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmv5-00021g-AQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:46:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]:33866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmv5-00021c-22; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:46:51 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 17so66516268lfz.1; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:46:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wTfo+GMwhrbMLUi8aoN9gTII/T5YU0hWZYCk3MQKIWE=; b=i/GdRKgvwjnut4iUxCwebwKUTMMNIM+whaEX7/I9m1MVTQjwLlSmxybO0XqdIrkZ9R ezk7eBHTNiKBCWH8iwnJORjTRp9Lu4fYWBlPExQXDuj8d0FNilotmzzsebiIBOEJbySo Yz/LRjxsibZhDaVZAckoSUoM3d8r8+WGhDZbZaLHzwtc16N68nezkiHwxftx33AjYe1l sEAjHFeYCJLwC1C1kz3lMWDX+vh96a9/Bm2IKh8Kosd5xr/lTssu9WShFEb4dVaJTvI3 C5rOQ6iAMjUKCNqxUKXoeqNRbireNpGljtVYybP80lEh52zFh28Z++InX34wmtLekzA6 BHsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wTfo+GMwhrbMLUi8aoN9gTII/T5YU0hWZYCk3MQKIWE=; b=TdzX9EjiL9pSEVNaR713Jl8NuS2lRCheKhavbLBf9O92io1cDg6KUw9r18V8TZT91W jkHFwe7cm+0Pq+T4cIOiRrP8flRpTKQzVnGLiZxRoYbMJQORpvmUmp1/otB8tHnrVDYa vf3StZDeP3+vNTi+5BxlJDuaHAoep2G8mwou9d4E0PBIC2BKSyoMIuww7eXyap2rq1yv 0soNw6o4XqSW3kA9tyTzuT7/rhSM8wuehGUicX79y3i00qq4NS12QbH4Ogm6nUyvvYXp NjcyC5vKx7+YrYVVHMexrWU/aNhTCvhnSvPDe4dT+dgTxQZqaVCxU99KCBqxuT84nx3j Q90w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/W9ZxGqUV6fiBGhhhtERo/lsC/fWciJCL7tKD6K+33zAHRTRaaYfI0pU9ZQ5uYIfeCHynb5R7zFsJSWhEalwACoXEmQ== X-Received: by 10.25.29.147 with SMTP id d141mr1486889lfd.26.1452797210153; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:46:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id zm10sm926065lbb.49.2016.01.14.10.46.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:46:49 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/43.0 In-Reply-To: <83h9iggga5.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198150 Archived-At: On 01/14/2016 09:36 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'm much less worried by the name of the command than by the UI it > presents. People keep leaving the naming decisions up to me. I'm not happy about that. > If what you suggest allows to do the equivalent of > dired-do-query-replace-regexp with a similar UI, then I guess we can > bind that equivalent to 'Q' in Dired and be done. It wouldn't. The alternative version of dired-find-regexp that I proposed wouldn't use the "traditional" UI either. If it would, it would need tags-loop-continue. How will we obsolete this command, then?