Re: tags-loop-continue

[Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>]

On 01/10/2016 08:08 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>> Because tags-query-replace uses a special keymap, we can bind
>> tags-loop-continue to M-, in it. _Maybe_ we can similarly use a new
>> keymap during tags-search's execution.
>>
>> If you think it's a good idea, I can look into it.
>
> I think it should be okay, thanks.

All right, looking into it.

> As long as the command is
> interactive, it can always be rebound, if users so want.

That applies to both proposed solutions, though. And even the case where 
we end up without default binding for this command, as long as its 
un-obsoleted.

>> On the flip side, the users may get confused that M-, is bound to
>> different commands in different contexts.
>
> But the current binding of M-, makes no sense while tags-search is
> on-going, I think.  So it sounds like a good compromise to me.

I suppose. My main concern is that someone can get used to M-, being 
bound to tags-loop-continue, and then use this key combination outside 
of tags-search, to an entirely different result.