From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 21:12:22 +0300 Message-ID: <56929F06.20601@yandex.ru> References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> <5691795E.9010008@yandex.ru> <83lh7ym725.fsf@gnu.org> <5691D768.3020908@yandex.ru> <5b7c961c-e5ff-4ca2-bb26-dfc1d1e60d7f@default> <56926C23.6000708@yandex.ru> <7321a48d-1b17-45eb-8863-d0ee42ebece0@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452449558 10319 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2016 18:12:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:12:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 10 19:12:34 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKTg-00055E-Us for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:12:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48402 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKTg-0005Gl-6X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:12:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKTc-0005E8-6V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:12:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKTZ-0000VX-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:12:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b]:35379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIKTY-0000V8-Ql; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id bc4so243412941lbc.2; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:12:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=96zxSw2P3k6LGgufxF45ncn5bxkVoNjfd/sojFbQxnA=; b=CgviBxKGffuaPfyi6PXLY9Bx4QC8ORNwzT5Imf/3KzCwclMu/C2+/GxW4XPuTUb5cx C5cUlO6k20q8aB9xEmsibHHByhsxvf2rF4uLiKIiAORSZLfOaeysIvXbrP75kA0R1+xW HwMa8tbmRvxx4qNV+vfTRNAzFaPYAC+GOjMYvqNvnfBcX56zeP4lmiwCN9/oAZ6q6dus ZG4NuSn+wyPm1+lxqDiD8FaAHw8VIsxK7zCReZjnN3sAbaBKIy6JrSX7rO+mqlIpTma3 zxai+gGXT6sXrtqlswXU+lNVjilPcqAmGxgWgxp/mYKSLHSLvBODc5EmfcvOP1G12MUY hsww== X-Received: by 10.112.12.104 with SMTP id x8mr877045lbb.41.1452449544081; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:12:24 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m64sm20241277lfd.45.2016.01.10.10.12.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:12:23 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/43.0 In-Reply-To: <7321a48d-1b17-45eb-8863-d0ee42ebece0@default> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197989 Archived-At: On 01/10/2016 08:53 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > That's poor reasoning, IMO. How many users have used > `xref-pop-marker-stack'? More. And in any case, xref-pop-marker-stack goes together with xref-find-definitions, so it only makes sense for them to use close key bindings. > The absence of user complaints during a period when the > thing about which you are counting complaints is not > even present in a release is hardly something to go by. Indeed, we're missing the data from the risk-averse part of the population, which only install the released versions. Still, a lot of people use pre-release snapshots, and that crowd must be pretty diverse as well.