Re: tags-loop-continue

[Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>]

On 01/10/2016 06:54 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> I think you've just heard from someone who evidently does use them:
>
>    http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-01/msg00627.html

But not with default key bindings. I'd classify Ingo's message as an 
evidence that we're allowed not to care too much about the default binding.

>> C-, is too nice a key binding to spend on them.
>
> You mean 'M-,', I presume.

Yes, sorry.

>> If we want to retain some global binding for tags-loop-continue, let's move it to C-*.
>
> I'm afraid it won't go down well with the users of those commands.

None of the early adopters complained thus far.

In any case, we're changing a lot of things already. The most 
curmudgeonly users will have a lot to complain about anyway.

> Besides, 'C-*' is not available on TTYs.

And here, I meant 'M-*'. The binding formerly used by pop-tag-mark.

> I asked "how", not "where".  This command (tags-loop-continue) existed
> before and had a keybinding; it will also exist in Emacs 25.1 -- how
> do we explain that it now has a different keybinding, or no keybinding
> at all?  What good reasons do we give for such a backward-incompatible
> change in a veteran command?

The command won't change--only its bindings. Because we expect it to be 
used considerably less often from now on.

>>      Other than that, what technical solution is used to keep the command
>>      and its keybinding available is unimportant, I think.
>>
>> It doesn't seem like tags-search uses any special keymap during its execution.
>
> I didn't talk about tags-search, I'm talking only about
> tags-loop-continue.

Because tags-query-replace uses a special keymap, we can bind 
tags-loop-continue to M-, in it. _Maybe_ we can similarly use a new 
keymap during tags-search's execution.

If you think it's a good idea, I can look into it.

On the flip side, the users may get confused that M-, is bound to 
different commands in different contexts.

> I think it should remain an interactive command
> (so it could be easily rebound and invoked by name), and it should be
> bound to 'M-,' as it was before.

I will stick out like a sore thumb, being entirely useless with the xref 
interface, and only serving the more obscure use cases.

Let's not take up the handy key combination just for that.

> We will need to find a new binding
> for xref-query-replace, which is unfortunate, but I don't see a better
> way forward.

Apparently you mean xref-pop-marker-stack. See the two proposed ways 
forward described above (use M-*, or only set up the M-, binding during 
tags-search and tags-query-replace).