From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:52:13 +0300 Message-ID: <569172FD.3030708@yandex.ru> References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452372752 8541 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2016 20:52:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 20:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 21:52:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Uo-0005jT-Ly for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 21:52:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42950 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Un-000710-Vo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:52:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Ul-00070m-DP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:52:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Ui-0001v1-88 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:52:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]:35684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Ui-0001ux-1J; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:52:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-x236.google.com with SMTP id bc4so237187119lbc.2; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:52:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sJQrK7ZRWXvVoSMn68v7TI1oeoCzLFmyke5BUMZ+r14=; b=g9nk/RXDkxOTAbJH4GNxwZqvDAe8eyIXtc5/Lu/uSk8FGKzUI3zbHnJeUobvJ7HqFk Rp3m74Icw0MItCw+glqY+Vt3dEzMOM5zrrDGuEzWoj9275jRqm8QGUtDphuQr9kl/Fl2 TpQzGPm5QrQA8YaJG9i1+EL37HfHqvrTwVT9dlV+Kqr9rCYr97uZdTr3cts23JZV6XrC CZGEoH0KjszDQdWAwGvdF1dMqy+CL10kz4eyWcAwJMJs+KgG7nXTG61VR9FXuwYWYAy0 74WmmgXBHsuzm98GKIMEb9GeSgFNAdQRV5S8B6zLONobhDxrEHI/QQcgjXlqV+y4yStE A8yg== X-Received: by 10.112.168.5 with SMTP id zs5mr18936597lbb.56.1452372735220; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:52:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p66sm914433lfe.42.2016.01.09.12.52.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:52:14 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/43.0 In-Reply-To: <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197931 Archived-At: On 01/09/2016 11:49 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > If it's only supposed to be used in tags-query-replace and > tags-query-replace now, why does it need a binding? It only seems to be > used in a non-interactive way. Sorry, "and tags-search". >> Maybe we should rebind >> xref-pop-marker-stack back to 'M-*' and leave tags-loop-continue on >> 'M-,', WDYT? > > I disagree. As per above, its interactive form is basically obsolete, > isn't it? We can avoid this conundrum by defining a new, private function (say, tags--loop-continue), which will be non-interactive, and to which the now-obsolete tags-loop-continue will delegate to. And use it in tags-query-replace and tags-search. WDYT?