From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:49:10 +0300 Message-ID: <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452372565 5976 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2016 20:49:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 20:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 21:49:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Rr-0003Ii-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 21:49:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42938 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Rq-0006P6-MH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:49:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Rn-0006Ov-Ej for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:49:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Rk-00018k-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:49:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]:33723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aI0Rk-00018f-1E; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:49:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id m198so47456103lfm.0; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:49:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mat7+MI1hMuFiUyY2gxYG5yutDVUfm3whggnj8zZ3bc=; b=vaoXfQHfiFlZy8tXqnxw/90NhK3sRstSagmUfG393hg0YnrDpsU/cw1pCySvEvWxFA sAyPX9J1cWLkU+Ibl7m4w9EwINBBAOQ5jYHUo6XSwrVpx/WINCoLXHcDqVJv8/NLpKFN xlkQEi5WkUS06UFBsK6E9UQp/GG1dh45jEWPqExOinnDa8VbZkdq4/p70GH2/9R5Uhwu ewWuUE8BZgBhfFhM49W2tdNq1rTS3hN1vbyVdXSC3bIdvOLIZL8EN1QN09cfsX0kUBsa R0ywqHks7sS5JdzkhGkVMRX4YEdL+FcWO2Yoj3cpZaju+F1AC1158EkldvglPpE0cvgx JugA== X-Received: by 10.25.88.77 with SMTP id m74mr2870219lfb.149.1452372551341; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:49:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n185sm863324lfd.27.2016.01.09.12.49.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 09 Jan 2016 12:49:10 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/43.0 In-Reply-To: <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197930 Archived-At: On 01/09/2016 11:42 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Of course, the real bummer would be that it no longer has a key > binding, and its previous one is taken. If it's only supposed to be used in tags-query-replace and tags-query-replace now, why does it need a binding? It only seems to be used in a non-interactive way. > Maybe we should rebind > xref-pop-marker-stack back to 'M-*' and leave tags-loop-continue on > 'M-,', WDYT? I disagree. As per above, its interactive form is basically obsolete, isn't it?