From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1452: Acknowledgement (23.0.60; Problem with nextstep, longlines-mode,) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 23:50:25 +0200 Message-ID: <568C3AA1.5050903@yandex.ru> References: <20081129.145347.35808910.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20081129.155222.124907962.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <20081129.161126.71259916.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <5vy4c46ifr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83oacz5188.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452030686 8576 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2016 21:51:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: hanche@math.ntnu.no, 1452@debbugs.gnu.org To: John Wiegley , Andrew Hyatt Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 05 22:51:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aGZVX-0002wt-5m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:51:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51581 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGZVW-0000Xk-NP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:51:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGZVT-0000Xc-GL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGZVO-0005xs-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:51:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGZVO-0005xo-C9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aGZVO-0003ON-1o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 21:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1452 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 1452-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1452.145203063513005 (code B ref 1452); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 21:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2016 21:50:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39240 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aGZUw-0003Nh-N7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:50:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f194.google.com ([209.85.217.194]:36317) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aGZUv-0003NU-9J for 1452@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 16:50:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f194.google.com with SMTP id ti8so19318360lbb.3 for <1452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:50:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yPypG2ATJvVsQXBTsIdT8iAkFpCwysBmBNseei7B9Jo=; b=jImskpnuqLil6WToqKK5TWKDPl55oHXa4Q4uPxbRv1k41Y69iIvTi95E/JaKRrKTR2 iUGGf796IZecpC1ln/MNWMbsnXOObcotyQYGrIQrqMOpex28n3Gq6zBfC5HcvyUqAmfW Dv3Xz5FBan+VCoTyW7v6zhlP2C0qJ6jH31a/08WCnoTt+FqNMbgMmrjjI49THEKiculW 6jPejPzmJXwE13LnVlk4Rhn4WYAl5yrD0Dn/uTdeJji3VuII4fG3pvyWyughvZNCyPPI kwUztavjozfpa0WGyXaBCUnO2SdvkEkAMrlwpVXrFFaITUDkTQ44D4+lwqDuPQMDi5/V jfnw== X-Received: by 10.112.219.101 with SMTP id pn5mr5767479lbc.123.1452030627458; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:50:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id pn9sm1307482lbc.37.2016.01.05.13.50.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:50:26 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/43.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111276 Archived-At: On 01/05/2016 11:34 PM, John Wiegley wrote: >> Has anyone considered putting these obsolete packages in the gnu ELPA? I'm >> not sure about the bug policy, but I'd guess that bugs shouldn't be filed >> against ELPA packages. > > Interesting. I'd be for such a move. That usually happens when there appears a person interested in maintaining an obsolete package in question, in ELPA.