From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Sauermann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1012: calculate-lisp-indent Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:58:20 +0100 Message-ID: <5683B8CC.7070001@sauermann-consulting.de> References: <48D895C4.6020901@gmx.at> <5683876C.8080200@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451494399 7741 80.91.229.3 (30 Dec 2015 16:53:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1012@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 30 17:53:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aEJzq-00041R-9u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 17:53:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53039 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEJzp-000050-QX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:53:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44965) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEJzm-0008WR-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:53:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEJzj-0003OL-G3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:53:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEJzj-0003OH-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aEJzj-0007Tt-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:53:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Markus Sauermann Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:53:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1012 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 1012-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1012.145149437728729 (code B ref 1012); Wed, 30 Dec 2015 16:53:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1012) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2015 16:52:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50579 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aEJzc-0007TJ-IE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:52:56 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp3.bitpoint.de ([80.67.224.15]:36146) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aEESd-0003h5-Dd for 1012@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 05:58:31 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 In-Reply-To: <5683876C.8080200@gmx.at> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:52:55 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111032 Archived-At: Hi, Am 30.12.2015 um 08:27 schrieb martin rudalics: > Did you look into the snippets from Example 2 and Example 3 in the > follow-up message? All issues reported by Markus still apply, at least > here. Unfortunately, I rarely indent constant symbols, so someone else > would have had to chime in. But I suppose nobody really cared. > > Note also that the second patch is probably too large to qualify as a > tiny change and I have no idea whether Markus is still around to do the > paperwork. still around and still using emacs, but I haven't experienced this issue during the last 7 years. So I am not very inclined to review my old patches. Sorry. Best wishes Markus