From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stuart D. Herring" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [Patch] Documentation for pgg-gpg-use-agent Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <56798.128.165.123.132.1146069256.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> References: Reply-To: herring@lanl.gov NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146069299 7566 80.91.229.2 (26 Apr 2006 16:34:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 26 18:34:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYmyN-0003hI-38 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:34:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYmyM-0000SH-Jn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FYmy9-0000Rm-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FYmy7-0000RY-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:34:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYmy6-0000RT-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:34:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.65.95.54] (helo=mailwasher-b.lanl.gov) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FYn0p-0003bH-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay3.lanl.gov (mailrelay3.lanl.gov [128.165.4.104]) by mailwasher-b.lanl.gov (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/(ccn-5)) with ESMTP id k3QGYJPL009082 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:34:19 -0600 Original-Received: from webmail1.lanl.gov (webmail1.lanl.gov [128.165.4.106]) by mailrelay3.lanl.gov (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/(ccn-5)) with ESMTP id k3QGYGQI021614; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:34:16 -0600 Original-Received: from webmail1.lanl.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by webmail1.lanl.gov (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3QGYG05008466; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:34:16 -0600 Original-Received: (from apache@localhost) by webmail1.lanl.gov (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id k3QGYGL9008464; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:34:16 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: webmail1.lanl.gov: apache set sender to herring@lanl.gov using -f Original-Received: from 128.165.123.132 (SquirrelMail authenticated user 196434); by webmail.lanl.gov with HTTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-11.EL3 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-11.EL3 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53484 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:63031 Archived-At: >> | @defvar pgg-gpg-use-agent >> | When using GnuPG (gpg) as PGP scheme you can use @code{gpg-agent} for >> | caching@footnote{Actually @code{gpg-agent} does not cache passphrases >> | but privat keys. On the other hand, from a users point of view this >> | technical difference isn't visible.}. If non-@code{nil} try to use a >> | running @code{gpg-agent}. It defaults to @code{nil}. >> | @end defvar >> >> Is the second sentence in the footnote necessary? Never mind the second sentence -- what about `privat' instead of `private' in the first one? Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.