From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: reftex.el autoloads Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:12:01 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <56743E61.8060102@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87h9jqo9a5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87d1udxaky.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83mvth6jsa.fsf@gnu.org> <87poycvrp7.fsf@russet.org.uk> <566B2BFC.1070802@cs.ucla.edu> <877fkj1q5j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83si375x03.fsf@gnu.org> <8737v71oo0.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r3ir5vrb.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4czz7ul.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oadv58fm.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9jmks0u.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87zixexam5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <0ltwnjbj6q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zixagvs4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83io3xzqo3.fsf@gnu.org> <877fkcyd7r.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450459587 12917 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2015 17:26:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris , Phillip Lord Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 18 18:26:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a9ynH-0004e9-7i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:26:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34238 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9ynG-0003rc-Km for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9yZd-0007RW-BM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:12:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9yZc-0004WV-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:44743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9yZY-0004TP-26; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196261601E7; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:12:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id jiSojeY74IQZ; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:12:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDACB1601EC; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:12:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id CTwFZ_byGOu5; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:12:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DDE71601E7; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:12:01 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196482 Archived-At: On 12/18/2015 08:39 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > Somewhat disappointed, but obviously I'm in a minority. > Anyway, it doesn't build. Did you test it? Yes, I suggest reverting the change from master until it's tested and known to work from a fresh checkout. Here are a couple of other comments. That's not the right way to declare autoloads-force to be phony. Also, there shouldn't need to be an autoloads-force at all: if some other files need to be built they should be listed as dependencies of autoload.