From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22083: 25.0.50; hg: adding tag enhances the rev, modeline does not reflect Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 00:05:08 +0200 Message-ID: <56660294.7060004@yandex.ru> References: <87h9jzy70u.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <566103DA.2050901@yandex.ru> <83610eioei.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb8eto9d.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <56627F41.3000805@yandex.ru> <86h9jx84ni.fsf@gmail.com> <5663361D.8060805@yandex.ru> <868u56qqas.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449525984 19407 80.91.229.3 (7 Dec 2015 22:06:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 22:06:24 +0000 (UTC) To: Andy Moreton , 22083@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 07 23:06:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a63v9-00010r-ST for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 23:06:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56689 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a63v9-0004Dd-A5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a63v4-0004BR-N3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a63v1-0001rl-Dk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a63v1-0001rb-6R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a63v0-0007vv-5V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 22:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22083 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22083.144952591530432 (code B ref 22083); Mon, 07 Dec 2015 22:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2015 22:05:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42088 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a63uE-0007um-Rq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:05:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:38164) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a63uB-0007ub-V9 for 22083@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:05:12 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so5824568wme.1 for <22083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 14:05:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EkOzBZCQ+ZunyQC/M/wNwePYAnTEpQsUE12Bce05oAg=; b=wj2e5cXLdKsBFCjiqqmGth9dpyMHFaXxvlBlYLKNW+vsWrHiK9GPOQxHZXSsJoWo0h 64ZYMieKpfCXjL2zv0VszWfbimfK7nepoKDsqig3MrLbuuBCOUHoDc6/Gey3zRIFmfM0 gikLy+1SzL+Iy5OiLsIouH+5aWOKoytby5lsz3ctqDfc1yhmHFuro00RQjXS1ZVO6b27 Mb4FEhLyU3lM2MzAgpuxO7jD8skkhMVNhjMUKpNkuG4v8dQfTJy6TmYIAnb/axqyYaQH QCXk4GeJYNEZgvFsCi1TqQFqKBtMJgXjs2e2+uGsP6SaLrU1vY191cV+7zx9BO0Lm2bg oewQ== X-Received: by 10.28.21.204 with SMTP id 195mr635316wmv.17.1449525911333; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 14:05:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id jt9sm85091wjc.24.2015.12.07.14.05.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Dec 2015 14:05:10 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <868u56qqas.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109733 Archived-At: On 12/07/2015 04:36 PM, Andy Moreton wrote: > You don't need to know which branch a tag is on, you can simply checkout > a tag as expected. ...as long as the tag is present in .hgtags in the latest revision on the current branch, right? That's what I meant. > The Mercurial book is a little old, but has some useful detail: > http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/managing-releases-and-branchy-development.html It doesn't seem to go into that detail, but https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/Tag says: "Updating a working dir to a particular tag will take that directory back to a point before the tag itself existed." Anyway, this is a bit off topic, so I'm going to stop here.