From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22083: 25.0.50; hg: adding tag enhances the rev, modeline does not reflect Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:55:10 +0200 Message-ID: <5663411E.8080602@yandex.ru> References: <87h9jzy70u.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <566103DA.2050901@yandex.ru> <83610eioei.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb8eto9d.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <56627F41.3000805@yandex.ru> <877fkslnh3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449345383 10512 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2015 19:56:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 19:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Uwe Brauer To: 22083@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 20:56:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IwF-0004NP-6i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 20:56:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47589 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IwE-00085p-H4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IwB-00085Z-Ak for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:56:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5Iw6-0002cj-B2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5Iw6-0002cf-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a5Iw5-0003yC-TP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 19:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22083 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22083.144934533515224 (code B ref 22083); Sat, 05 Dec 2015 19:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2015 19:55:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a5Ive-0003xT-5b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:55:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:33630) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IvJ-0003ws-Rq for 22083@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:55:32 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so116636844wme.0 for <22083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:55:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GVUnkQmu8Jf3ddbLBWMN4GD8ZYX9arNef4aCRXNAYnE=; b=lwAF6yqwRJWh4LLT8i8Q3nMWnBBNls2NDxgEDn+/kX6D0wvLAIcaStvyf0Nq9LTkCv lMC+D5qHUfXZPNCozVSlx0Au7nbMsLpSm3YuxCysmB53cmNUHC8zT5gNAMh9JWH5M4qW FFvt4GWklIV+tVPw89Gf6KsfFaUmTHvsq2zHaeDhQ+lijYuPc6taxZ4U0ej/fEelRAoD Icyno2X2mDEE1PL0G+dkP0XIoR0Z/heayqjRouZU+eDEyU1P5fVX8SKUEW6P/8Sq11F1 ELKgnRqTDVA+lc1f4D84s9rUtT5H4iD4H07E/Rl7wFFNvvAIQcXdycc/JubXNZKegNAk lTCQ== X-Received: by 10.194.145.97 with SMTP id st1mr220157wjb.130.1449345313235; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:55:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w203sm9007652wmg.15.2015.12.05.11.55.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 Dec 2015 11:55:12 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <877fkslnh3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109671 Archived-At: Please send the emails to the @debbugs.gnu.org address, not bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org. On 12/05/2015 09:11 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote: > So I suggest that the modeline in *that* case (of an added tag) shows > Hg-7/8 > or > Hg-7/8(t) Yes, but why? Are tags more useful to know than branches? Are branches a subtype of tags? Is 'tip' a branch?