From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21934: 24.5; find-tag: reading TAGS file incorrectly Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 20:33:28 +0200 Message-ID: <56520A78.4070807@yandex.ru> References: <87ziyd20cb.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <564AA697.9000203@yandex.ru> <83egfj4i2b.fsf@gnu.org> <56511795.2050207@yandex.ru> <83si3y2et4.fsf@gnu.org> <5651F350.6080203@yandex.ru> <83h9ke2av1.fsf@gnu.org> <5651FED4.8080508@yandex.ru> <83d1v13nyl.fsf@gnu.org> <8737vxsxd4.fsf@winky.hogwarts> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448217272 10407 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2015 18:34:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 18:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21934@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Matthias , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 22 19:34:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ZSq-00075r-8W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 19:34:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57044 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ZSj-0004IH-3y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:34:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ZSf-0004H9-Pd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:34:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ZSc-0003n3-Jl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:34:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ZSc-0003mt-Fy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ZSc-0007Y8-5J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 18:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21934 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21934-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21934.144821721328974 (code B ref 21934); Sun, 22 Nov 2015 18:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21934) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2015 18:33:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ZS9-0007XG-8P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:33:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:34368) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0ZS7-0007X8-Bu for 21934@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 13:33:31 -0500 Original-Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so133371400wmv.1 for <21934@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 10:33:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HatJjG3TxoInmFU/4VGxENa3Zlot6Ttxm4jBezWYhDI=; b=LrfXhMHgwp36i+99ttgBQztRzS3v4SSiZSBlWAIhtoMKI0Zf/16Lb42uO0OaGRm7El K22j3CEbXIGhiFeEU4b4rRnt3UZ8bAqQmDKkJwmmi5T1Tf0bpRYGKD+mJoPWmz+LDm7W wv4vHk60MLO4XwIUJll1rvQIgg2jVz/JDDRfSZtAWwCr0STGHOEgImTIwVSjby5yKY3h PwaIJuu4uxAdek+3FwlgcqSN6XhmCms+S6/ofENCu+gQ8ZITow8ZOtRz3FVR56+oG+AE PnlT7dEuft9Gorc3hhbsIuD7Zxu8BeylkJ/NZje6X5eJAwC1WOKZNmDn++yqB3P6ROvX RHXw== X-Received: by 10.28.50.70 with SMTP id y67mr15074058wmy.91.1448217210851; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 10:33:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h189sm9708684wme.1.2015.11.22.10.33.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 22 Nov 2015 10:33:29 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <8737vxsxd4.fsf@winky.hogwarts> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109095 Archived-At: On 11/22/2015 08:27 PM, Andreas Matthias wrote: > E.g.: foo:bar.baz > > A class `foo' with a table `bar' containing an element called `baz' So, "foo:bar" is a valid notation, even when it's not a function call, and even when 'bar' is not a function? Is it any different from "foo.bar" then?