From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New ELPA policy proposal Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:50:22 +0200 Message-ID: <5640C0BE.8000702@yandex.ru> References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <87611bh19q.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <85ziyn9nuv.fsf@iznogoud.viz> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447084276 22863 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2015 15:51:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:51:16 +0000 (UTC) To: Artur Malabarba , Oleh Krehel , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 09 16:51:01 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvoii-0006m1-J9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:51:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53554 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvoih-0004Ci-Sn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:50:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvoiS-0004CY-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:50:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvoiO-0002qL-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]:34067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvoiO-0002q4-Lu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:50:40 -0500 Original-Received: by wmnn186 with SMTP id n186so111331957wmn.1 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 07:50:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5sOZbHugaCfDEkSQQOXXMTwBWxWl7r1GYf/GxSJvvEs=; b=ITS7soFvJLQLgluMdFVD8ZBgpWpcMTrzr1efzQS8DZsY4uLpAMnhIXRPYQYIP29hCY wNSQj8e8nTF5ZviugchSccGmkN++jyYvzFrS+sUfPbnbbYLuh7530CzXTF7u3ziK8pX3 c573LEJAPFekluM31WBYS5LxCBzUdeQ0GNQ0YEg13xDHWT65hACo8DnwzaCjWj05vmBO jgXeMVFaZzgfzyauRA7Tmwcuskh86kyKQSccu6xq3COwptI0D/Mzj5b9I1ABqWIBunmG C3JxLjB/gWIUKy0NuPyYPeIYOo5ByhcoOF6TrkH7QMZKaXOJ4iCVFGqm+EFHOp7bdrmQ Q7Iw== X-Received: by 10.194.21.170 with SMTP id w10mr30096467wje.29.1447084225071; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 07:50:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e79sm14949238wmd.16.2015.11.09.07.50.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 07:50:24 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <85ziyn9nuv.fsf@iznogoud.viz> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193715 Archived-At: On 11/09/2015 05:41 PM, Wolfgang Jenkner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09 2015, Artur Malabarba wrote: > >> * The first and simplest issue here is that we would lose control over >> the code on Gelpa. > > But when is control over elisp code not bundled in the emacs tarball > actually needed? So far, the code that's been pushed to ELPA, has all been more or less reviewed. AFAIK, when Stefan pushes new versions (if that still happens semi-manually), he can make sure that nothing precarious has sneaked into one of the packages. Since GNU ELPA is the official repository, the Emacs developers have a responsibility over its contents. Not just individual developers.