From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: ToDo list and bugtracker Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:15:39 +0100 Message-ID: <563CB60B.7020209@online.de> References: <87611hp2jk.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wptvdfqj.fsf@debian.uxu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446819329 25989 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2015 14:15:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: John Wiegley To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 06 15:15:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuhnS-0007oI-R4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:15:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39001 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuhnS-0008I5-0Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:15:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55119) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuhnN-0008H4-VW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:15:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuhnJ-0001DT-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:15:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:57333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuhnJ-0001BT-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 09:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([95.119.233.86]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MEOE4-1ZfGO727wW-00FWI1; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:15:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:9Am2NRfqExAJD6YvbNiT9PrlgBh+LaLmlG6qsHkg53JhhOEtVwP ODiuOKmtyZqVlS4KiULG0VQ5GqvzmukjdKngFgVd9VL2c8aWaKZoUcZ/LAZ0zFdKVLKyUeM I8xeyLZQ8ZvmFL1Uw4SI7d7Z7VFV+jLtywHT/q0pjRZoXWPEhUPszqLEHDQjv9cdFw8CApe w20wcixrCQjScYa1/Co+g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:JEUqjzBoxYE=:FZ3rq7jdOF53vPYZe+0XYA JqmedA0KuBm0tGzetN//vozEpdDLfuTC7dCYm6hy5Atp6q4vDfRG3jFGuaJ7oFAnJGEnb1i2F dG9Fc1YUz7/VLLSL90DqUKOcgBQJlw7eQ0NfnyNu2y/SUW5yGU3A8W1YKjJQAkuy7zQwU84Xr 9QgObX3jtM8eOk22Vkx4jcWWkz0jMXws+WCb5nRqgC8/FtgY+00Sh0Lu5TMJFp6eQt+vt4VAA VkBeUdlA3rF/y7K9jjFDIUpssrMa4JrNvI72jyzAXNC2LpWNtC/auUaE0i9VCjh6SpRo+mBT/ IPvxsLb4CWESV4VxbBpRuojWnT0tmclTYDfdjkz7VqYJzH0fFO3dau+MIukgypm7p+kzpVzGG CuFBb3/UuLTXX9D68d7o6838UwWGM7Pmsx7d4rtpPd8ixBaIH7SAE5JTjtv0PcP7eD5lLQRTs 25GZTLW7Fl5LFfytsTL8B8bkyvzWgZdjqwuc4fK+PT0qcRYh6uvk2WSAG2bTEWlNgUm/ZVCYv +KB40E94v32ReMjrUQT1bJBwcgHupNCE8buXCDugI5XLBcRKrQstG7A5q5j09AVwaEO/n4Sxm elurx6hgnQ7UaasG0zyZRM2OGEJeIXjv0iyPjGe3uQxoW6hJDiW1Kopy4s6+G9k5sNoaONe/7 k6Il/4wWvsYGEDPdxIP2iOc++Tl0/YJ/VyRGwZXzKuDq7TDaQu1X2d/u44H2WMo55m2CWH/dC 7+URgQExVF88NHFZ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.130 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193415 Archived-At: On 06.11.2015 03:31, John Wiegley wrote: > > I'd love for someone to take care of our under-appreciated components. +1 > The > TODO list right now is largely the bugtracker. Would you be willing to comb > through some of the older reports, and find those bugs that no longer > reproduce, or help resolve those that have patches needing review? Such a role > would be extremely helpful. > > John > IMO that would require a joint effort at least of Hercules and Rübezahl. Because Emacs changed, older bugs aim at a fairly different state, thus real hard to re-track in many cases. What about archiving old bugs after a certain time instead, so historiens might grab them if interested? Cheers, Andreas