From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21816: elisp-mode-tests fails on a case-preserving filesystem Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:18:18 +0200 Message-ID: <5638DE4A.308@yandex.ru> References: <86mvuv30i1.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86y4ef16ha.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83d1vrw0p9.fsf@gnu.org> <5638D836.8090600@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446567568 1467 80.91.229.3 (3 Nov 2015 16:19:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21816@debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Leake To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 03 17:19:17 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZteIj-0003Xs-3r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 17:19:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49623 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZteIi-0000W2-HQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:19:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZteId-0000Ut-OB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZteIZ-0005sl-L8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:19:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZteIZ-0005sh-HM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:19:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZteIZ-0003CG-2S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:19:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:19:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21816 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21816-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21816.144656750312210 (code B ref 21816); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:19:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21816) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2015 16:18:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51648 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZteHv-0003As-9p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:18:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:34250) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZteHt-0003Aj-Ss for 21816@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:18:22 -0500 Original-Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so75006426wik.1 for <21816@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:18:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B44Di5Rw/2cxqQZmHcGAO9LYYBqrmmWXoX04DW6Qu2Y=; b=cfldkjCdTVRy/GGJCT1MyLmUoO74SFiJNo5owDSVAmVjtJoS8sLZzjhqIfoKwRe4h6 szBuQV7weKz9iJAQnBg46AjV0HcF/3xovaADe9kg9O0+eMf++NQC2r8z2a/sZ+b38mB9 9ZdZV3lG+hEdZldvLJp+9T12pozT1vGljtUcSHcCG7owmDudlynObCbfR65BRReOjtKE vaT7+xkHtdfgJYpQ9FvOmqXtZr9VrzRBh9Grb2YjOKRgC2XxO5w2QO1VMvJGk67BPqCz phDSMVPmqIXdqV63CTtW3ieINodQ1slBb9qCeBl0bQSFjE6WzPYcZCpw4hfxAWQtS7Uz 0JbA== X-Received: by 10.194.243.232 with SMTP id xb8mr30079805wjc.138.1446567501216; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:18:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm28289321wjx.41.2015.11.03.08.18.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:18:20 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:108359 Archived-At: On 11/03/2015 06:04 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > I'm not sure where you're arguing that > > a) xrefs never need to be compared > b) they are sometimes, but it's ok to use equal and fail in > case-preserving and case-insensitive systems Why don't we canonicalize the file name somehow when an xref instance is created? > We're here discussing a real one: a test that needs an ad hoc fix > because it couldn't just compare two xrefs. Or do you think that writing > tests isn't a real-life example? It can be solved as above, for example. > I'm a bit surprised to be discussing that the basic type offered by an > infrastructure library as xref needs ways to be compared... Compared in an impementation-specialized way? Yes, I'd like to see a use case. It's very nontrivial to write a comparison function that would work beyond the type you're currently defining (just one xref subtype). Hence, its applicability will probably be rather limited.