From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add shell-quasiquote. Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:11:05 +0300 Message-ID: <562683B9.1060305@yandex.ru> References: <87si59wj42.fsf@T420.taylan> <878u6znii9.fsf@T420.taylan> <877fmjj9p6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zizfm2dq.fsf@T420.taylan> <871tcr7yvq.fsf@fastmail.com> <87mvvfm0bd.fsf@T420.taylan> <56250803.5080601@cs.ucla.edu> <87a8ren5ys.fsf@T420.taylan> <56259BB1.3070908@cs.ucla.edu> <878u6ykmvt.fsf@T420.taylan> <87h9llvo98.fsf@members.fsf.org> <5626622A.3090707@yandex.ru> <87zizdijbp.fsf@T420.taylan> <56267302.7050606@yandex.ru> <87io61igyu.fsf@T420.taylan> <56267CDF.6010201@yandex.ru> <87wpuhh15s.fsf@T420.taylan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445364689 30094 80.91.229.3 (20 Oct 2015 18:11:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , Nicolas Richard , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Taylan_Ulrich_Bay=c4=b1rl=c4=b1/Kammer?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 20 20:11:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZobNX-0008S2-5Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:11:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47407 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZobNV-00035R-Vq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36389) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZobNS-000356-HY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:11:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZobNO-0001HR-NT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]:35874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZobNO-0001HL-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: by wicfx6 with SMTP id fx6so58006543wic.1 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:11:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yeGi7Tx+Bu3abLn9I3Al3G3d/Yw6wFUixnSJMK3b7sU=; b=UnEBODClS4DffapYTWqnWN7Z4WpjdxxEdfW9P046mF+b44RDpezpDIwv5/EDDDpp+O ORLg9ChX+Xj25/SBOwToIg0OtgZvjducfb4Rj3BDLGvaOIN03+u1LSPqvOeNU1Ku9Fip kUDVoIlj02ahurte1eG+zbANFXNuwiWEqi3Lju0qD4Ho+xOTjs5g3IwPr4NQshRKKVMn jrPHUbLl38rAii1wYyPNmQB4FXLL2RjiGGKN9pLn9HYer5mLFNIoOX0RU90Nqz3aXq/X HQc2zZV0z3zpon8RKdQncchIhz2tjfgFP18OjSlzW5AC9QJ5fCOSTtZcpOeaHrNhrRbI uM9w== X-Received: by 10.180.188.134 with SMTP id ga6mr6295392wic.34.1445364669837; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id vr10sm5291508wjc.38.2015.10.20.11.11.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:11:08 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <87wpuhh15s.fsf@T420.taylan> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192219 Archived-At: On 10/20/2015 08:58 PM, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote: > And that's *precisely* what the patch was trying to fix. How about you > support me in getting it applied instead of searching for reasons to > blame me? I honestly don't have an opinion on the difference between your and Eli's versions. But if forced to choose, I would pick Eli's, purely on merits of reputation. My point, though, is that issue is orthogonal to reusing the standard function. If you re-read the discussion, you'll see that many others have expressed the same opinion. Of course, with the explicit goal to spite you personally, because that's important to us as a community.