From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add shell-quasiquote. Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:22:03 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <5626783B.8020906@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87si59wj42.fsf@T420.taylan> <878u6znii9.fsf@T420.taylan> <877fmjj9p6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zizfm2dq.fsf@T420.taylan> <871tcr7yvq.fsf@fastmail.com> <87mvvfm0bd.fsf@T420.taylan> <56250803.5080601@cs.ucla.edu> <87a8ren5ys.fsf@T420.taylan> <56259BB1.3070908@cs.ucla.edu> <878u6ykmvt.fsf@T420.taylan> <56266A24.6060004@cs.ucla.edu> <87r3kpihx0.fsf@T420.taylan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445362020 12803 80.91.229.3 (20 Oct 2015 17:27:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Taylan_Ulrich_Bay=c4=b1rl=c4=b1/Kammer?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 20 19:26:51 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoagM-0006Vg-HM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:26:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47246 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoagL-0004ef-Kt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:26:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zoabw-0000ct-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zoabt-0003Xc-57 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:22:08 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:40095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zoabs-0003XP-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A81E1601AD; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id nKyMU6E0w7q9; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6391601D5; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:22:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Y7WMF_fVC_6O; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (pool-100-32-155-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [100.32.155.148]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C3D61601AD; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:22:03 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: <87r3kpihx0.fsf@T420.taylan> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192208 Archived-At: Taylan Ulrich Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer wrote: >> >No case has been presented that there's a significant problem with >> >it. The argument that one might want to run an executable named "if" >> >is, as you say, a trivial one, i.e., not significant. > Yes, a serious case has been presented multiple times. I must have missed it then, because all I remember are the cases (1) of r= unning=20 /bin/if (which is trivial and is not a realistic example), and (2) of=20 installations with nonstandard shells (a problem that shqq--quote-string = does=20 not fix). It has been a long thread; quite possibly I missed something.