From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add shell-quasiquote. Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 00:32:52 +0300 Message-ID: <5622BE84.8030209@yandex.ru> References: <87si59wj42.fsf@T420.taylan> <83eggt4esi.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv19wh7b.fsf@T420.taylan> <83bnbx4d7e.fsf@gnu.org> <87twppuzfu.fsf@T420.taylan> <83a8rh48if.fsf@gnu.org> <87io65utmt.fsf@T420.taylan> <5622B337.4050700@yandex.ru> <876125uqzw.fsf@T420.taylan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445117587 13076 80.91.229.3 (17 Oct 2015 21:33:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Taylan_Ulrich_Bay=c4=b1rl=c4=b1/Kammer?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 17 23:33:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnZ68-0007Fh-Dn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:33:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnZ67-00086d-D3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnZ64-00086V-Kc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:33:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnZ61-00047Z-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:33469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnZ61-00047U-2U; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:32:57 -0400 Original-Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so51993464wij.0; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:32:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xH/sxj/5DSSPW/aiOnWuGclEwkpHm1pv3Uzz/5jAA/g=; b=ojO29Y59rUhN4V6TWA0MldWIZgHAY4vYeOe6YgiF5eAEpjMkZpwSfPDlZrBlCU5rwW WRWI12XGLKxQql8iLpfV0vZFZAuhyonU7MR449D/0XVuAHmKs27TfVKYjS6dZ5Y+jxfD u6CEsJ8x0ukrp2qwT4sZe6b7EegG7iO7JxVNFie86tld8mzv4BIBIE63SIeOlWDsivKG Km94wlSXi1v3kTH5yGTE0XZ5/pFG5C1pZDY2v8Dy77vIhLkojkFZNdWH145la/jSYZYi CWKXdUkXoWsxGWudoqBaOewUOFgQ/LrHVtnduckV0Fl03X2nbuD/csqwoTpqxrrssI7c pq8A== X-Received: by 10.180.105.4 with SMTP id gi4mr12639430wib.23.1445117576590; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id vr10sm21910001wjc.38.2015.10.17.14.32.54 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:32:55 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 In-Reply-To: <876125uqzw.fsf@T420.taylan> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191888 Archived-At: On 10/18/2015 12:25 AM, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote: > Not knowing that there are bugs is not proof that there are no bugs. If you can't point out a bug, you have no justification to not use the standard function. >> Either way, please avoid reinventing the wheel. > > It's not a reinvention because it has very strict semantics with regard > to safety guarantees, which shell-quote-argument apparently doesn't. shell-quote-argument doesn't guarantee quoting the argument?