From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Przemys=c5=82aw_Wojnowski?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:20:03 +0200 Message-ID: <561D6773.4080003@cumego.com> References: <561A19AB.5060001@cumego.com> <87io6dl0h0.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87lhb82qxc.fsf@gmail.com> <87oag4jk74.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k2qrki45.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83oag3oosv.fsf@gnu.org> <6909324d6de8929192a27fc0be8267d4@mail.iq.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444767683 18836 80.91.229.3 (13 Oct 2015 20:21:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:21:23 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 13 22:21:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm64K-0000AG-1I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:21:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39184 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm64J-0007Sq-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm63O-00070V-4C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm63L-0004jE-1B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp23.iq.pl ([86.111.242.228]:38879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm63K-0004fO-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 15152 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2015 20:20:04 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.106]) (esperanto@cumego.com@[159.205.196.239]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp22.iq.pl with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 13 Oct 2015 20:20:04 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.111.242.228 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191509 Archived-At: W dniu 13.10.2015 o 18:06, John Wiegley pisze: >> The truth is that nobody cares about performance as long as it is _good >> enough_. > > This is absolutely not true. Lagginess and lack of performance are the primary > reasons I avoid Eclipse and IntelliJ as much as possible -- even when their > IDE features would otherwise make them a better choice for some projects. But *you* are a very small sample compared to those users, who have chosen those IDEs with *good enough* performance, but more features. Simply, things have different value over time. It's also true for performance, which has lower value when is good enough.