From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs rewrite in a maintainable language Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:40:31 -0700 Message-ID: <561C610F.9010302@dancol.org> References: <561A19AB.5060001@cumego.com> <87io6dl0h0.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87lhb82qxc.fsf@gmail.com> <87oag4jk74.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k2qrki45.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87si5fvgjm.fsf@maguirefamily.org> <87d1wjpmyn.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="917vu5rpu4iQJTNPbhaWwUS6N754wxHC4" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444700468 27272 80.91.229.3 (13 Oct 2015 01:41:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:41:08 +0000 (UTC) To: Alexis , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 13 03:41:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZloaJ-0006MT-6M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:40:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59916 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZloaI-0007yc-C0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:40:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zloa0-0007yJ-5n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:40:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZloZy-0001fY-Qq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:40:39 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:35053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZloZy-0001fU-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:40:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=S8u/0IF6ae7mn3BAMySsiK+Y8Wd7b1d2sL1aUOCPoBk=; b=BiYiIjVIiF5QK8u0LJ5GZRXICsjbM9nCqjLaSaWwoDNAIQUxzpg3m26mzDYY7+xpMa6GTpjJV4QBNez0tF+YWcL8QboTUlKN/xAasLZrVDb5XytVbyKzcJbNnV9W/Vjo/EXTVEaqVzHfcNABKr5lqnrxb++hHzcJweONIxcOcnhv7mFpkE24/UUTZmyCYwdaFXTSvHVWnOAenqTsWljHY/xVGTm6S4O9ywrpU3GNMpTGv3lY4Xhsifewo4WV2BPL+OxP1mvwlSHY0N/7jTrBeFu8TKSjoEAIE++iRtetTR8s4M4GZCJsN2CC7nI5JPMWZkD50ogG9HVCMSxCPubFNg==; Original-Received: from [2620:10d:c090:200::2:9bdd] (helo=[IPv6:2620:10d:c083:10fb:2ab2:bdff:fe1c:db58]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZloZx-0002wj-Kc; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:40:37 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: <87d1wjpmyn.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191420 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --917vu5rpu4iQJTNPbhaWwUS6N754wxHC4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/12/2015 06:38 PM, Alexis wrote: >=20 > Camm Maguire writes: >=20 >> Has anyone ever considered using GNU gcl to translate lisp into (very >> fast) C? >=20 > Well, a couple of months ago, Pascal Bourguignon wrote: >=20 > I'm writing a C parser in CL, so that I may read the C sources of= > CL, and then translate them into maintainable CL. Then I will be > able to compile a CL GNU emacs core, that would be 100% bug-for-bug > compatible with GNU emacs, and on which you could run all the .el > (and even .elc) you'd want. So then, instead of C, we'll have a C AST represented in CL. Isn't one custom language enough for Emacs? --917vu5rpu4iQJTNPbhaWwUS6N754wxHC4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWHGEPAAoJEN4WImmbpWBlpXwQAKMu8dbe39kgFc6QvalWTa84 jsQj9jMJM/UUtc5I+GQrZQiSe2HVmD5h3vUdCMymx1QUIUCj0aZhHSlyYrV8FIBN 4N9/2OKmKVpN36otlvEGG2XmLdoI5olhTEvEfbbilwYXJyjWvnwb46A+hvHjx+py j2D3fKSOeImYB2sqTuDrvcFwW26BMO0Mwx7cpZl5BmmGqc+q3eHyhNFDePCvJPx8 GaLF9SLco3Iu2V9TMhaufdnLFOGUlCT0+oF1WEqG4RYqTuotu6kIPXnVe/HIQIfy 2oXDLD+xe/YesCZcMJV+2DnZtA8p4s14Yq5eD9FsTqPz3E6VaAvRot0eeyfhVULp yIvs72cnLSptQc8kZ8o9Sr2wsH/N4uWXi5TsVpt+hsrRMJiMmFbN6nNTBqrv2o5G R4UZDbkY4aGRiPy7GpCFmnJhlQxo5c4TqSAaVNpro6XAX6caUbmrpZ9w2ryYnQnF STUdjVAGeZ191j8k+QylaqGWJxs39f9DzZcYYfln5fBC/PyHB3oxBLnnmO/fTGuY ORgul6sXq019JC3SI53Cjp3z/pexPkNk2rAe51BqdF+hH3ck+ieoIZn3uTdQfT81 Zx/UaLthqNxUBzpJKPR1aR5r7XtzEwHNX+LltS3chcA1EKhcGFHcK5fF89e/wIuQ rRGlusAS5QDcV3O8aC3J =b5Fc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --917vu5rpu4iQJTNPbhaWwUS6N754wxHC4--