From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: burden of maintainance Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 19:19:31 +0200 Message-ID: <560EBCA3.7060609@online.de> References: <560CEA6A.9000907@online.de> <834miaa847.fsf@gnu.org> <87twq9a3d3.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8337xt75ok.fsf@gnu.org> <560E9BF1.4070106@online.de> <83io6p5mi3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443807183 4188 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2015 17:33:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 19:32:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi4CQ-0005bE-Mk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 19:32:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34051 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi4CP-0007J5-SA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:32:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi3zc-0007KU-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:19:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi3zZ-0005Uy-Ri for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:19:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:62792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi3zZ-0005Ui-Ha; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([95.119.55.225]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MW3dQ-1aAfcq0W40-00X1Nh; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 19:19:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <83io6p5mi3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8HtcCiLHnHT7o7yy1xtz4ui4bvEXES6GxECPSQvbFVlIo+cPRoy 8XlJBC1TRjBZk9dOVI9aZ/0sdj8BeYl/UAOGB/JyAZEw7ILLRvX37l+F6xxpK11caPMXEJj PhI6wdA/INXNTGuJP5AOfqlN1c3SQjDbbP9l6wpkkzKfoBbkY0ARwrg3WGbrc1imnR3cuzq /Vqbu0s8J8YDV4JgYhvEw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:D2RCO3fPzEc=:kz3aNljMHWMYeintkaDPz8 cT1FqEPhKLZwdpWQYV2tRn7Xk1sTjUcMSxKKU8EOOsQ9YQLg9IV/mHsmpwCgnZRpn2pKfDyQC doo/W1e9nwT02n5PeKBMniyo5XslCb7kWw1Ke5azX8HRuiqc34Ys/GzVQ75L2qSToz8hO0JQI jCIlzE6FSBgFe/5doOajLASC1GZLhtFmexwSC6jLToGmaAd71f0mTKvOOf6CoY6lLqJr0nNtE wCYaRVI6vEBf2Mfkfj6/F1y/kU632dDdV6hJvgPjggNnW+3QcBJ4fdUU1yp/oerSvh6UZLJZF PPHaACakiNSMzhcg14p3uP2A23qrAk3TAWeJOdpOytiXChSgsJtLAMzSvbbkT4FejZAKpKDem xVx6iy4awvIpjrgYJzKLoLODy1jk+f9IIAoMsmSEy/mXFV5NVQHuetn8UAP2CisOerifiwfGJ 3B5pW1CXUNzed7UrA8F+Ql8q4Rp13HV0W4R/QcA6xef7DWm+aqbmeed3q3vNCOfbxzLFDD2dC IpiCnw6luX/rAzqWHz3KCw1tIymYKwr5s6AhQ/th9YIOuPZxAMUD+pKuO04O2m0Tc2i0w6/Bb 300w4ndoXqGgbCo4QoDZHn23/QSRe7LJXl2L6pVoOdTO4I5m29t1rNZHQT4QpnzHpDwrtUfvS bLbcxM9p/MVBnsZFQiKK0wr0SSrwLdQqZAwiSGuBm5atNXxdisYkcciC4C9AaRolwPfKTS05+ Di4tKBA75RtVOEqP X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.187 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190728 Archived-At: Am 02.10.2015 um 17:16 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:00:01 +0200 >> From: Andreas Röhler >> CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Am 02.10.2015 um 15:36 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >>> I meant if we require each contributor to accompany each commit with a >>> test, that could prevent quite a few from contributing. >> Not just require, but let's say: for the time being, >> every committer should be encuraged to asked the related part for test >> coverage. > That we already do, although we could do it more. > >> If there is no test, writing the test before any other proceeding should >> save a lot of time. > I agree. The problem is in practice, not in principle. > > What about creating a co-maintainance WRT code-quality?