From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: burden of maintainance Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: <560E9BF1.4070106@online.de> References: <560CEA6A.9000907@online.de> <834miaa847.fsf@gnu.org> <87twq9a3d3.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8337xt75ok.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443802585 21845 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2015 16:16:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Phillip Lord Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 18:16:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi30E-0002GN-46 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 18:16:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32937 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi30D-0000k5-HO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi1ox-00071g-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:00:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi1ow-0004pj-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:51758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi1op-0004ma-Cc; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:00:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([95.119.55.225]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue004) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZyo7-1Zw6zm0rhH-00Lj4b; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:00:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <8337xt75ok.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:BJfAts6CacnSIg2SFpd3AXLi0xAVzZ1+W8nj/qhTQIgPpTj5qmZ IKEaJokM/mYD1xAqGFXBcFBUmrBMFGQyzsQm5ApcNHvuY7BVCiSa55YBFtoB7FO83HnQCK/ mZEAXS4oEe4+m3+nz5kW/3EbhAgwhxFh1FcBaj6tkoiRyiSC7WAYcClOTX43Lf9jiJhgQRp C611ShUw6eo4FOxZx//ww== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gPuLHu2F4S4=:Ui9rRib1SyDVGMZUqDvURZ JWumNrnaycTGoTQxn/1ggly8/FNAHE3OXPzxLPCZKvOctdmgFLBmGJCq1WMIwTeFGPAP1Dirv 16OKPxw6usTB2BCIraqnXg+GGmjsQ+Q9UwJ15XzlbLVcttiEUpW1ww+U+lpAqu38+v2D50NAX Ls6QNrT1XlpyrEnSbw+YYvQQkkWeCXkk7EJereRWqoykky/z1crLN+L0pGwollfAeypK+bWWl 1WJNSOLBWDsMcx/RigYYEB2/U74ACxlXHIEnkN7+r2dnLZQ5jl7ivSAdye6Hw94dg0dJuDPlh MfeJpv+Mr3rXWT7cGkzz16PwWA7HUXNnu9byrsbOE4s7l0or2vO+UU+nwWlKLC0c6nyuPaEJC RW8J59IImC9W21pJzTqmvtuxgnIueiW2/d4Vjx3zBswgTMuftJGkbEqFsd1entT9as3scrBR1 RwDuv4VWQpxBl7iPUrw1A4kPZhhOIShfIvC8qqB1y039ATFJdZF5u31IQGc4bAhcZL/Ia62MG yWjr1ltMnogW3dM3C643ebg5S+aQbQDEOGDcWI+mT77KDVj6kqcG94EDOVjEyP3vcnnssAlBB Gx0vHQOUPCSBhKLRpra6WkRSsGh5nmSKofKr+vsduVtE/WMBC+L1dxWPdF1g9FhiQ4zIoO7s5 V+k8iXXK3dBZj3C6L9rl8z3EJ3aOrnKSZQ0/9iFL7ssXNUeZFaXaYAc6bBqWemAafMukhZqZ2 kvJusw97eVWG9Mt8TJX2P7xu/Cok+kOP+LTKWx4TghSd8seFurQXdy/EoomnWvlMJgecbfAn X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.187 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190707 Archived-At: Am 02.10.2015 um 15:36 schrieb Eli Zaretskii: > I meant if we require each contributor to accompany each commit with a > test, that could prevent quite a few from contributing. Not just require, but let's say: for the time being, every committer should be encuraged to asked the related part for test coverage. Notably not stupid tests for all and everything, but the core parts. If there is no test, writing the test before any other proceeding should save a lot of time.