From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:54:04 +0300 Message-ID: <560E9A8C.9060607@yandex.ru> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87eghsfd3m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k2rknr2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvwellmg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <56023A6C.3020302@yandex.ru> <5602BE3E.1050009@yandex.ru> <5602C4DE.8020105@yandex.ru> <560B4899.2070708@yandex.ru> <83si5t7njo.fsf@gnu.org> <83zj015quz.fsf@gnu.org> <560E959A.4070905@yandex.ru> <83mvw15o5s.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443802299 16021 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2015 16:11:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 18:11:38 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi2vp-00060D-QA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 18:11:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi2vp-0000n9-8L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:11:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi1iv-0006JZ-0V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:54:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi1ip-0001jX-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]:33644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi1ip-0001jD-Mm; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so37608912wic.0; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 07:54:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4HwPzDr1WlInqnavNYTdz74LseDZZZR/w/38HRzXO40=; b=iE+x7xLLFrW5+8tOdvD1S4jEQWkNd/wEW9P1O3E8EPBKZ9w3aj67Ll11sMZmijCrvG Zk0khXYVdT2aMANtvWihbvU8MWd1hv39ROl2bNq6QG+Rf7pzB0LvtQY/85em5homHPBt CDBhKWrcDZ9ybDAgvUWoCPDP1uxTWxEhisz/ptUXKq2aEFPs7d8CmHmj/TjEtqSjry41 cCrlfs2fms+62h/5N/JLNe1gvTDa9zGrfO0V52gD757niFGOCfSTa/hywjBaw3t09wBP UPmqarNLgXk7qeWxDpzQVtTbrncJC55BneJXGSTq6wLRflX00ae2lmfnn574SfAqe9mf Uejg== X-Received: by 10.194.114.104 with SMTP id jf8mr18855569wjb.155.1443797646982; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 07:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id gt4sm8764762wib.21.2015.10.02.07.54.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Oct 2015 07:54:05 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: <83mvw15o5s.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190703 Archived-At: On 10/02/2015 05:40 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Using `vc-next-action'? > > No. Then that doesn't refute that statement, does it? "Still, AFAIK in typical usage of modern VCS, vc-next-action ends up doing a commit about 99% of the time".