From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Failure to bootstrap on Windows Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:52:26 +0200 Message-ID: <560E53DA.2040908@gmx.at> References: <560E4253.3050103@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443783416 27105 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2015 10:56:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 10:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 12:56:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhy18-0000Mz-Eg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:56:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58651 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhy17-00088E-M2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 06:56:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhx15-0005cv-Jf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 05:52:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhx10-00080u-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 05:52:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhx10-00080l-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 05:52:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [93.82.78.144] ([93.82.78.144]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGWR2-1ZvAQL0KG0-00DFjz; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 11:52:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Byyl7FCwXLkeuFy6yulGkioW42lJTFJ9gpiguBu0c5HkBncxz9C IvjHDgBXiqNh0Twz8oWCEQC7J0HyDC3aUkwJC76YlP5WylzyMJ0JKUGUw+Se/0qj3F1YIic VSiNzT2bp0yF3vSkvEJlv96EWPWhh7D52749XrPx+v7x3LeCszaR1epWOCnZZ9anCLd/Api UNx2VKbbl1jMkUhi88HSw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mE2HqWuaE1Y=:pAtdHh73It+eSupOqfNiVO 1mUC9UH4YIcUU3LGhyCNPUTVV18g3U5vOVOundsUQLMmdEz6XV/0y+kqVcV5NJS4dCYfQMmQu 9/S6l7+gIjt4X9NL9l9X/Q0wscH10B5j6mtomnl2Qfd2VYjXrBUbZxNOhuIWY9xnl6ezSco/A q+jNRNTG6g2VKuIP0ZUJlglbPy/YgLqm4JiRRQsMmVOEeM965/B3NW4IUaxOiWdD//DcKWTfO l87a0mfFeLXYo6p/soh/lzHKuWMy79RcVVYNw95B0BkR+k7WDabRSV8GBizPpxVDwLaxbGBau XH9bVu2qfYzo43R/BnPKZUVrAkzPFzQGzWFng8+cIM65G/1/H02J5hSlZeTd9Jmo0vNf7jtTt 53fJ+HUUP8KuXB+K+0XkRXitLY0DNs/qTrfvz5TJCzGWAYlwN+zSlxDOC5jb3Sknc3GcLmbYa jk3/lHu+KwMkvxd1jdcd3LGHYu8bq9hdgCh68LObBpbSkX/2MrlnBr8BwUg3xy1KC6biox737 ZtRXlaquy+VgL0ATiyhjtrbXevqcw9KY7vnOz+JhNashGjWxdVll/xruPHtiv6Vm6fgn8y3fu k/V1//KsK35iKX4NOSWcbtLWdEXmcbwLn2wQqr3frdKX8sajtKRx3caeHOUAVefvKOvUNr3nE oJcPkV/rHK9fQVd0rzkPXn8Vs4gw3Tdj9Y4Nkyl+zFiq8nhcmbMGgBTnq1JSv9IgH1mWL5iEv MZhqLpGCY5Nzr3obuXUMdsL6YOnkuQ3EKkFdORpXly6MWmmZGmhkdy1WWAwtrzUKHpVvx8h9 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190669 Archived-At: > Curiouser and curiouser. Why is it so persistent for me and non-repeatable > for both of you? Hmm... The only possible explanation I have is that (1) I ran the script and it failed, (2) I cleaned something but _not_ everything (1) produced, and (3) I ran the script again. The something I did not clean in (2) might have avoided failure in (3). martin