From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:04:56 +0300 Message-ID: <560D9FF8.4010801@yandex.ru> References: <560BC90B.1040902@yandex.ru> <83eghgatxa.fsf@gnu.org> <560C9BB7.2070408@yandex.ru> <83wpv79iel.fsf@gnu.org> <560D8CD8.7080307@yandex.ru> <83eghe8ini.fsf@gnu.org> <560D9236.6020008@yandex.ru> <83d1wy8i27.fsf@gnu.org> <560D9610.3090305@yandex.ru> <83a8s28gun.fsf@gnu.org> <20151001210104.GD2515@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443733524 18140 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 21:05:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 23:05:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhl2U-0005Tj-9z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 23:05:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhl2T-0006Jn-RQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:05:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhl2F-0006IE-Me for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhl2C-0007k3-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:36857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhl2C-0007jp-D5; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:05:00 -0400 Original-Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so6930490wic.1; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:04:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D6cFasJNC8L09X6nFndqWFNSR9z/QjvCPVLArd+gBHY=; b=JZlw713iSsIYUi139+msRxb006D1x1gk1MYXjzHRyRkihiztmdtV9ehc4aLz0K5ycq bowlERwUmTexPskHGcUsfxvm88pp4iLciP7uDP48tyUpDodl9KTxxBtqMPnQaeQTzIQO yDxjngx4OeGe55lxjplsh/2wN1Kw0uV+Bv+Z8qtb7be3wdTs+5t+C4b8sdTkAydvnNEe 5hKYco8K8VQJTBPQHE55MxBHAqWlr6fnNENZolldJOpv4ufnWrmaBZVfUxV0u5W6lTO8 O7F8y2VcfHXT0hWxCrydOgM4mDbGhrvvZppylxX/oSIsGTF7heZ1F7+LYYU0tJ6/e2Bw 557w== X-Received: by 10.180.93.131 with SMTP id cu3mr760289wib.8.1443733499750; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm5049276wiy.14.2015.10.01.14.04.57 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:04:58 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: <20151001210104.GD2515@acm.fritz.box> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190602 Archived-At: On 10/02/2015 12:01 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Also I think C-x v v would be very easy to type by > mistake - an accidental auto-repeat when typing the v a bit slowly would > do it, so that's another argument against it for me (or at least it was > when I disabled vc a decade or so ago). vc-next-action doesn't have a > yes-or-no-p in it, does it? The binding is not under discussion, the semantics of the command are. But removing `C-x v v' from the global map is a valid approach, as long as vc-dir-mode-map still has it.