From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: `looking-back' strange warning Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:55:02 +0200 Message-ID: <560D8F96.5040200@easy-emacs.de> References: <560B9C7F.2060301@easy-emacs.de> <560CD7CE.4010404@yandex.ru> <6524c81a-949c-40d1-b990-d214d6ee5b60@default> <560D73DF.8040403@yandex.ru> <560D7A68.8040404@easy-emacs.de> <560D8289.6010409@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443729554 17292 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 19:59:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tassilo Horn , Dmitry Gutov To: help-gnu-emacs Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 21:59:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhk0M-0007sB-89 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:59:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55980 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhk0L-0004dZ-OD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhjwa-0002wB-HY for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:55:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhjwX-00005H-C5 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:52992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhjwX-0008Ue-3w; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.31] ([77.12.88.20]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue005) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQb5V-1a4eYV0o2f-00U1k3; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:55:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <560D8289.6010409@yandex.ru> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6aqQYDx1lr1wZA6VmvMmjnuByQvmd4MBFIe4eoScQBnfXmLuuft jlQWZkjWYjwUCGYEl1BK+5mWD9x90EdjrqvThNU8UcSXPDC+VfME7TCfewRCQsCUSKtDREI k8qT6o2J7yD2nd8rgwet6yg2rlRkBg3QtpkWNjefD2OC6JSXZJ3UyCn6q47gFsrZzshGp63 i35k6l7jCvX/3GlpEBNsQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:3HS0MdwIoAY=:KjdLAKUUAI1JqKScotReuV SixDvf2JmJu6WZEwpUSxD+Pz0VHidX2zIkk0Tvb82W+R8+XlWg7BvfC9wUZKgX2GdMXmuZxS9 NFueuWZHxR5fTfMukIPp288H5Q7QGXFdsspe99M3I6IQIokxPY7u1wE86gBU2kNIb8zojXpdf jUuuc10ECRBg+1eymFg5RXwGgDXWbkEdFfGZWh3t0sWJu57MUSuEYIAlulLYr8RHthydVwzoM nGCHcb4FTFQ14DYoZ7SFjIN4NkdgrbYTGd7YPTbnf65BlxFHK1DsiGlGlpHXSpoeK/jDHxq8D 5LRs4j90tXnqbc1oCHX18GdLr/QE2Z1uUXHfFdNcmmWfOS1eup4QzsykfZs2XbS4PTvmOvIYE oH1aA4qirHUdUQaDVxwoRYI96lxbH+ggjEuMGyMfUAOPDGlsyQy3fiou7F4xVhF+xCAoYgal1 J3W6qqvoo6HYTgVk1i/ThEkaCkvoncn84jEyhhIwWSHZ3XcvzMYfsLjgwaBBfMw3gj1duy9m9 d/1Ome5iARqu3YiAGN57DjeW4Nze8F6y6vz7vPAiCIksbE9Wpzu77Ry+KoFsEbuy1TaQOXWng tjbs9STp4f48qBLNIpPG7mpixu8sYPJBD14sgG5I6zxH5R/Tr+SG4OihLIYxz5X01826olZTq S+T1HgAPlHunz/5DRpv9xe7uBa+DT5wBajGvpLaa9MMD6AFoFhsQobX3tcMOti7sVitk7nmaa rVPLYsLb8d0dXw6N X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.130 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:107437 Archived-At: Am 01.10.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Dmitry Gutov: > On 10/01/2015 09:24 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote: > >> BTW the intendet use case doesn't exist - as Tassilo found out. > > I'm unconvinced, but I don't have the time to investigate it now. > > If `looking-back' doesn't work as intended, or LIMIT doesn't help, you > or he should file a bug with details. The short-coming is well-known and was answered years ago like "didn't have time yet to implement backward-moves according to forward-ones". Might also be is a comment in source like that. WRT to limit: it is unrelated to the slowness. Depending from the task it might be useful - keeping it optional seems TRT.