From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:35:39 +0300 Message-ID: <560BC90B.1040902@yandex.ru> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87eghsfd3m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k2rknr2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvwellmg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <56023A6C.3020302@yandex.ru> <5602BE3E.1050009@yandex.ru> <5602C4DE.8020105@yandex.ru> <560B4899.2070708@yandex.ru> <83wpv8be0x.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvw4b871.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443681557 5735 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 06:39:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 08:39:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhXWN-0008HJ-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:39:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38692 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhXWM-0006ro-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 02:39:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57615) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhFfz-0001Fh-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:35:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhFfv-0001VT-9J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:35:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]:35760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhFfv-0001Ui-3y; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:35:55 -0400 Original-Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so192334409wic.0; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:35:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FonFKH8pa3XgVXbRGrm2dHBIxkL8heUzKAUtOT2iKAk=; b=qw9xvC3qe0rGQve2NGg1DDWc9t2vap/j19wDEV0QjB7WGkWEOUzvwI6MmeqM/hgdHY 5qMVelHbQdPkZAJex9N5j2wGtoSwxllJSsx4ExjbkVqDhQwzGQW7XbnvipscwQxT9oCG fh7at0sMKEnLnZkYIKtg4sBwNwYOUUvuwgnj6vfeBLjgdNCk8b8zTUlWXvPIf+FGh9On g1jS/Ac6EOlKqwantyardLLt36184SPYXlxR2lbSDy7C1/mzAnfh8Znad5LLwIfqDxLg EuCHsRCAWObakOCYIvJZsnO4WVDS49ROY9fxMsBbBEAsvTz20m9GUF5+/k5PuwemdOFs 0mYw== X-Received: by 10.181.13.241 with SMTP id fb17mr4022310wid.45.1443612954584; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id uq5sm193698wjc.3.2015.09.30.04.35.52 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:35:53 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: <83mvw4b871.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190516 Archived-At: On 09/30/2015 11:52 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > You mean, the only problem is give vc-checkin an interactive spec (and > maybe add an alias vc-commit)? And vc-steal-lock, and maybe "unlock"? I can't find the part that implements the "If every file is locked by you and unchanged, unlock them" part of the docstring. That sounds like a lot of micromanagement for users of backends with locking, unfortunately.