From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21568: [PATCH] Add prettify-symbols-alist for js-mode Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 23:18:12 +0300 Message-ID: <56084F04.2040501@yandex.ru> References: <1443268188.7436.0@smtp.gmail.com> <834mihgvb9.fsf@gnu.org> <1443283198.7442.0@smtp.gmail.com> <56074E0F.6060209@yandex.ru> <83r3lkfleu.fsf@gnu.org> <560788DB.6000104@yandex.ru> <83oagofhhi.fsf@gnu.org> <5607A721.2020002@yandex.ru> <83h9mgfe78.fsf@gnu.org> <5607ADCC.8080407@yandex.ru> <83d1x4fabf.fsf@gnu.org> <5607F919.9090600@yandex.ru> <831tdjg14c.fsf@gnu.org> <56083FD0.4020501@yandex.ru> <83y4frejbu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443385163 9633 80.91.229.3 (27 Sep 2015 20:19:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xfq.free@gmail.com, simenheg@gmail.com, 21568@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 27 22:19:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgIPc-0001If-WD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 22:19:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58637 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgIPc-0002qG-7A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:19:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgIPZ-0002q6-Hr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:19:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgIPW-0004QT-9w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:19:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgIPW-0004QN-7B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgIPV-0007nK-Lt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21568 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 21568-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21568.144338510629920 (code B ref 21568); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21568) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2015 20:18:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgIOw-0007mW-E5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:33962) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgIOu-0007mO-Rk for 21568@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:18:25 -0400 Original-Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so79631245wic.1 for <21568@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:18:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QW7uGlzbs8zXTYsE/+FQF8jb83v+ULNi6NRlWZEKYrI=; b=qmMaH2b9Ho44UylItCKh3hhd0ScGA6XlKgJDyGFKv+umdJ/TSf9EZmYDTlwpk+tIuD i/BnIwiuo8OjFXzbe7dRzPaKTA37pr5O/t20fZuOixSxpEuJ4HJ3tzHauti9ocN6J/H4 MsgoHV4zA8RTyZjS/ieuRGLkl87CpZI8Nm+32u1HsnqO1Y6jJE2n1HRIgAcrQeTPoupD wIXRNiGZITKS3l0FZLDTWSH6jplKGcG0SOTdIYOLX6iZPpiaulMhtpa4tfR+/Inio2IE MUzraCzlOuN7ardjJ9mWq/TMtZWH1uB2EBlqjfJXqQdIbH5dmpjZD2wZsvywXOQMdPdM xlQw== X-Received: by 10.180.10.101 with SMTP id h5mr13823566wib.22.1443385104117; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ry1sm14681699wjb.24.2015.09.27.13.18.22 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:18:22 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: <83y4frejbu.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106980 Archived-At: On 09/27/2015 10:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > No, please leave that text alone. It's okay the way it is. I feel that the last sentence causes unnecessary doubt on the part of the reader. After all, CONTRIBUTE is intended as a guideline for developing Emacs, and the less ambiguous it is, the better. >> What I'm referring to is requests such as this one, which I believe >> was/is misleading: >> >> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21568#8 > > I disagree that it was misleading. It implied that without that cookie, something in that code might not work well. > Now that we have that text in CONTRIBUTE, that's all there is to say. All right, thank you. > I explained my reasons right there and then. As a counterpoint, I don't believe educational purpose is a good enough cause to ask people to use coding cookies in UTF-8 encoded Elisp files. Even for external packages, over time, Emacs versions where they're necessary will sail off into distant past. No need to add to the baggage the future people will have to deal with. > I really don't understand what this attack on me is about. Please excuse any offense, but I'm not calling you names, or anything like that. I see an attempt to bring in extraneous practice into writing Elisp files (as well as reviewing the patches), and speak against it.