From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add prettify symbols to python-mode Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:15:28 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <56030860.30302@cs.ucla.edu> References: <1442777283-27514-1-git-send-email-mvoteiza@udel.edu> <20150921005306.GA29147@holos> <87h9mlwt6l.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83bnctliay.fsf@gnu.org> <83oagtjemn.fsf@gnu.org> <87oagt84e7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83mvwdjc5v.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2rh81c5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5602FFCF.4050805@cs.ucla.edu> <87bncs9awx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443039395 11560 80.91.229.3 (23 Sep 2015 20:16:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xfq.free@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , Stromeko@nexgo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 23 22:16:26 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeqSj-00076j-7u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:16:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50460 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeqSi-0005cf-Q7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:16:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeqSC-0005VL-Dn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:15:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeqS8-0007kT-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:15:47 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:47085) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeqRv-0007b2-FF; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:15:31 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A3F16114B; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id t2LfqRC5Hrn9; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25431161151; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:15:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 4_5cWd5n5uAW; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 089721607BE; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:15:29 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 In-Reply-To: <87bncs9awx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190313 Archived-At: On 09/23/2015 12:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/emacs$ git grep CALLN src|wc -l > 85 > > That's not exactly ubiquitous. Shrug. It's common enough. Fconcat is called in only 11 lines, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't be expected to know about concatenation. > Emacs C just is pretty far from a "non-issue". Pretending otherwise is > not useful. Neither is it useful to imply that this is a bigger issue than it is, which your example did.