From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:36:44 +0300 Message-ID: <56023A6C.3020302@yandex.ru> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87eghsfd3m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k2rknr2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvwellmg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442986625 24762 80.91.229.3 (23 Sep 2015 05:37:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 05:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, dak@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org, "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 23 07:37:00 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zecjj-0004Ik-LB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 07:36:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45348 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zecji-0006yK-Lg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 01:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41651) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zecje-0006yA-PW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 01:36:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zecjb-00083N-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 01:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]:33451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zecjb-00083H-Bf; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 01:36:51 -0400 Original-Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so222486573wic.0; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:36:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KPScuRg2GaGndCuCR23ltJb0D8VoBqYxfFc3S3EAvEs=; b=xeYEwGogXx0Pg1YrRGDKUv/DgoPRgLTxbMSjdE3u/TGXEYKeoa6D25DrNAum2e14aq emfPfTaul8b8Jr3XxFKHQ51n1S/Ood5Bcoy+4i1veheVudOL2u3HjsmQi9ZVBJuMmvZg 8DufWchtMH8bcwQlfN02BoziHuLg80jz2NdRvxZH9I9InTbf3Eb08zgyK4j05TP1etHz 6DZxEvV+maW0y698wXrcRUMTqa0wPV+dMUFVYZgF2m5B4+lPmLY1asruOaRSEV3NlRJv cqwSBdoIRb3fAC3ddAZ6+iVcUE96O8FhdeyNJcG1L85a+IWmvE7hP0zaUg/BBjAdKhZC CbCg== X-Received: by 10.180.75.176 with SMTP id d16mr1783245wiw.75.1442986610761; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id fu5sm3578616wic.0.2015.09.22.22.36.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:36:49 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190261 Archived-At: On 09/23/2015 01:02 AM, Richard Stallman wrote: > In CVS, removing a commit is easy and nonproblematic. So this command > could support CVS. If it supports only one back end, that's better > than none. Could you point out that exact "easy and nonproblematic" way? Is it the admin-privilege command? Or adding a new commit that would revert changes in the previous one? > If some other back ends can be supported by applying the reversed change, > that might be better than not supporting it. Maybe we should have both "rollback" and "revert" commands. Multiple backends seem to distinguish them already.