From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:24:39 +0300 Message-ID: <56003D57.2080102@yandex.ru> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <56000DEB.1000306@yandex.ru> <83si67n4ch.fsf@gnu.org> <5600373A.6090206@yandex.ru> <83oagvn1lz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442856389 17199 80.91.229.3 (21 Sep 2015 17:26:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 21 19:26:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ze4r5-0000qq-3b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:26:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59978 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ze4r3-0002Vn-10 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:26:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ze4py-0001VQ-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ze4pv-0005DT-Qs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]:37601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ze4pv-0005Bj-L9; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so121820525wic.0; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:25:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WEeHQcgXq4pGQUdhG9bOcISRw+nTn2zF8O6PfGv73AY=; b=TiwvcPIVdferLdUFyGbuI4P5C1szU+GNtXQPSsO0bAlHnkZ6edUqIJqTPjyPzLQJA6 FYbCL0VQwjcS4RZHRDeTqYI82UzI/83YdCeROA3bmtVACfDXjnHOuS7JplPDBsSyEKvA DuXBdKBa2NUlGDlua7Q0eahlVT7a7+Mjcid/WzWMfrnJZQYhAmDxX3l5Ab2IDn31yi3V iZvCUIRjh3/TYSoflexGdp4LU38vwAFrB4cwohZsALYDx5B1nb5TeBy/0BZXBvqiiGzS i3d9vrtp5kNP4qUhkNgAORRaufHBysSvrdEYcTE+FsspwsN09Zu0IvLpDeAK0Ap3wc1M QXLg== X-Received: by 10.180.88.4 with SMTP id bc4mr15830590wib.68.1442856307015; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.9.0.103] (nat.webazilla.com. [78.140.128.228]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ub7sm14520041wib.17.2015.09.21.10.25.05 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:25:06 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: <83oagvn1lz.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190202 Archived-At: On 09/21/2015 08:06 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > But what about CVS? Its "rollback" command does remove the commit > upstream. CVS has a "rollback" command? But if it does, sure, that's exactly what I mean. > Going from RCS to Git needs some generalization, so if Git's rollback > will affect the remote, when it should, it's OK, I think. It won't. That would be doubly dangerous. 'git revert', by itself, doesn't affect the remote either. Like I said, for CVS/RCS/SVN commands (which unavoidably affect the remote, because there's no "local" repository), the correspondent commands in Git/Hg/Bzr will only act on the local repository. We have `vc-push' for propagating those changes upstream.