From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Adrian Robert" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs.app (Cocoa/GNUstep port) release and feature list Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 09:58:46 +0300 Message-ID: <55f7df060711242258l1c7d5a39i784b79e2aa56fb6c@mail.gmail.com> References: <55f7df060711230241y6aeee7cfr12e61c493002014b@mail.gmail.com> <55f7df060711230810j72c73733qf67b8ecfed5af1b5@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195973948 30828 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2007 06:59:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 06:59:08 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 25 07:59:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IwBST-0005yx-GK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 07:59:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IwBSE-0003pm-KO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:58:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IwBSB-0003oT-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IwBSA-0003lJ-Cv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IwBSA-0003lB-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:58:54 -0500 Original-Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.187]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IwBS8-0001ZX-O8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:58:53 -0500 Original-Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so271585rvf for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:58:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=wFqSp72LL9n2l/Z48i5bnxEP6+m20CAsSzqJSHrbphw=; b=ub1QTv5rxoLoiX74RiEi0dv7QbFk3ovzS0J89yJoVS/sAKYnesxk8LJARpRPXrz5qTIgdtyyDEPxvLFOM1a0iXQ29qViqQNwT9kll9R8qKSNj4tCjE451wDXSuLBCm7JfNNksMFiC9XEoQIifnKIvuopLXUttRCW3GeahEyTlBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jqcNDtGqTxsS5Z+t9eZX3lbeozRuo87dSPOrTm1Tgr1hgt1idigpsTXFG60n9ni/9AIJBmlTjWh6lTUEWWg2U9/lm+OZtMlMeQC4jOeMjoV+HzH0jmyKwv+/tQct8MHCZRZGk4dNUKwuiijjA0gYMA/OXBPdHU87klLQGkns/9s= Original-Received: by 10.141.170.10 with SMTP id x10mr517411rvo.1195973926715; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:58:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.140.185.19 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:58:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84107 Archived-At: On 11/23/07, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > This port maintained its own CVS for a while, but that was messing up > > existing tags in emacs files and also making syncing with emacs CVS > > difficult. I know there are git and arch alternatives here, but > > Richard has said he is OK with bringing this into the trunk after the > > unicode merge and that seems like the best route for maintenance. (A > > branch is another possibility but that still leaves an ongoing merge > > burden.) > > I think it would be good to add it as a branch in the CVS. It won't add > any "merge burden" that isn't already present. And it will make it easier > to keep them synchronized, to compare them, etc... If this is the preferred route I'll consider it, but on the whole I'd rather just wait and merge to trunk, unless that is far off or might not happen. I've been posting diffs on sourceforge for comparison purposes. What was the merge process for the Carbon port?