From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS: (vc-next-action 1) only New Backend Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 02:54:22 +0300 Message-ID: <55FF472E.1000608@yandex.ru> References: <87mvwjohyi.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <838u83r6hl.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2rn5ucg.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <837fnmrizs.fsf@gnu.org> <877fnm4wzn.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <876136lr83.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83y4g2pxh3.fsf@gnu.org> <871tdulodu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83twqqpu91.fsf@gnu.org> <55FD87DE.3030506@yandex.ru> <83pp1epb17.fsf@gnu.org> <55FD9E4D.8080909@yandex.ru> <83lhc2pae8.fsf@gnu.org> <55FDBB3B.1070706@yandex.ru> <878u82ru1j.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83h9mppqqn.fsf@gnu.org> <55FEB04C.4090205@yandex.ru> <83a8shp2n3.fsf@gnu.org> <8337y9ow3v.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442793313 18646 80.91.229.3 (20 Sep 2015 23:55:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 23:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: oub@mat.ucm.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 21 01:55:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdoRn-0006sH-Ir for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:55:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54276 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdoRm-0002H4-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdoRZ-0002Gm-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdoRV-00088V-0H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]:35293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdoRU-00087X-OU; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:54:48 -0400 Original-Received: by lbpo4 with SMTP id o4so43738327lbp.2; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:54:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XlXk9NLeUXtKWu0uhml1y+zNW/9I2FDsst77CrDt3x0=; b=B0CVk5QspVENg1/+y7+BR4HvuF5mL0rdta1lYje1C7bSDa7ucP3LgB5AkQ35mGKZZL evPVR3oTylu52lo9Ioo4wK7LdWgHPoUE4xR5rYsw4YPBQByw9HE1F0Mx8xegD7D55iv3 q0bQGqkxBuiRri+tYyOtgR4qKX2F+wUwbGTBFUE51OA2tFeh0ml0uk+VXJBUsIVt+6/6 5yf8DDAPxXqqbdd0PK4tmFaTx9WytzCrfxnMuHc32zqH9s6fb6WOjrySH1jM2Go0k1aK uk256vlejyvQ8gIXiC+qkdv/PRPN0ImoUlF6sRff/+/soPIzqowanLPydBaPCZd5xH68 TzUQ== X-Received: by 10.25.144.78 with SMTP id s75mr1065420lfd.116.1442793287906; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.190] ([178.252.127.222]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm234007lfb.11.2015.09.20.16.54.46 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:54:46 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/41.0 In-Reply-To: <8337y9ow3v.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190161 Archived-At: On 09/20/2015 08:10 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Probably because you have no use for the feature in the first place. > Otherwise I cannot imagine any reason why removing a prefix argument > would make you happier. The calling convention is contrived as well. Why would "verbose" (the advertised meaning of using prefix for vc-next-action) mean the ability to input a new revision? The usual meaning of that word is just that a program outputs more.