From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 20:00:37 -0700 Message-ID: <55F789D5.3080005@dancol.org> References: <87si7977rs.fsf@tromey.com> <55DB7C3D.4090106@cs.ucla.edu> <55DE75FD.8020308@cs.ucla.edu> <55F5DD8C.70506@dancol.org> <55F62C16.4000105@dancol.org> <55F64F04.9030002@dancol.org> <55F6E43E.9030502@dancol.org> <8737ygz8z3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WISjCp1TbAsBFCLFuF7NjEWbH7fVnDom8" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442286070 8895 80.91.229.3 (15 Sep 2015 03:01:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 03:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , Emacs development discussions , Philipp Stephani , Stefan Monnier , =?UTF-8?Q?Aur=c3=a9lien_Aptel?= , Tom Tromey , Stephen Leake To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 15 05:01:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbgUR-0005rn-1O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 05:01:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44712 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbgUQ-0007E4-5v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42425) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbgUM-0007BO-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:00:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbgUL-0007R6-NP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:00:58 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:39488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbgUL-0007Qh-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:00:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject; bh=cM86LqM05pw+WvSaf7JZoi4IGM00r3Y+sJ+D61qEZo0=; b=LazWTauiTiYIWKbklSrX0WzIUfp4/i0rYDky3ojFZn2+UHXuPsXytWpcCvAat40uxdLuiVwa2J2vC+Fy/vlai5mf0uSDEhzYpN4XZVrP9r1YVoT87v8SalkFO+Th61sFcOZRMyyA9AeVvB4FuNbG7FoPMgKyPtScq9qsuy7a3OvNGOB3P2YiJzXEg07NEakkujZaxHFXrSnnj1gFb5GTb4fHDqYVOOnWQhEmWQ9zjbimDGCeZY4aL7W+OaVsYtW9BNFVSAFT5kVuRu348PFPRxOlrAwQ+scvL3ZhHNER1hR6WP1wgm/H0ETPW+fnWfrNEbwmbYg6M1AqQBL2MSis8A==; Original-Received: from [2620:10d:c090:180::1d54] (helo=[IPv6:2620:10d:c081:1101:2ab2:bdff:fe1c:db58]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbgU7-0004Qr-Oo; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 20:00:43 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 In-Reply-To: <8737ygz8z3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189964 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WISjCp1TbAsBFCLFuF7NjEWbH7fVnDom8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/14/2015 07:56 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Daniel Colascione writes: > > primitives. It's called Python. >=20 > You have a serious licensing problem, I think, which is one of the > important reasons why we haven't seen very much in the way of complex > integration in the past. The rest of the discussion aside: Python's current license is GPLv3-compatible, isn't it? gnu.org and Python's documentation both claim it is. --WISjCp1TbAsBFCLFuF7NjEWbH7fVnDom8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV94nVAAoJEN4WImmbpWBlcP0P/RUD+LF19SSxpopbX1Y0lJvi P6GQ9nQJzAWAugT5psfwvjbe4VKxGbktbyJ1K+59U+vKXnF6IiqXSUMYg26KIef8 7ciUW0M8gLaOPYrjMfYSrWiXZYBay0HEPVOvGRea0IFE6iJ+BNiHvC1q/jxvXLTC k8mqav1e0sXmeS30exG4OQLH3ITL6RuM9N6TUy0/8csEKQq6qXurXC4v1QqSE/r+ PwkMSD0u9y2dXQVJZUzglZW10g5d2+WtIzTqaQWzs16LDwij7DyrsLRq3HKUjPoT Rv4X04XX3ql6QWGvhfE3vLF0C7NW6FGcvOaaKf/C9jaVRcifO9dAAz3yg3jFwufQ mQbs+1yMgxsJpX47QpNSRoumNBAcU3wX/1O9uVk1eIeenFkwiQjikrh1i2LksLMe FHgxEmPtNuvI3QdRqSalYWN/FsphD6R+ntGFs5LAg0v5yRhtnCN7i9K3HQEQP+hf 3fSWp00avJCtvqmDaIX3YjVD7YhkQqJc4PI5o764ix1kiPVe63M/JXf5NuEKQXjf GgJVssqtiNkKccEd45SvFM0QXr4RAjTKNatZdVS5fnOGAkyiyEWZaWRlrM6CGAQJ KUBHogp5MvgfbVhoLK52VAt5lb2G/lCPhBjCHvJsDeJ2pg5bGqLuZqPum+YR2LHQ UhBf+FT62iIvRnju+r0z =f1/p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WISjCp1TbAsBFCLFuF7NjEWbH7fVnDom8--