From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21413: Top of buffer hidden when toolbar hidden and frame height is large Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 15:28:59 +0200 Message-ID: <55EAEE1B.1060107@gmx.at> References: <55E9EE59.9030402@gmx.at> <55EAC753.6030100@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441459841 12851 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2015 13:30:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 13:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21413@debbugs.gnu.org To: Devon Buchanan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 05 15:30:28 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYDXz-0007P8-EF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 15:30:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40509 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYDXz-0006Jp-0s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYDXq-0006Ak-P9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYDXn-0001Pk-JG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:30:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57251) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYDXn-0001MQ-GU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYDXi-0007d5-Tw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:30:07 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 13:30:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21413 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21413-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21413.144145975729180 (code B ref 21413); Sat, 05 Sep 2015 13:30:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21413) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2015 13:29:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49461 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYDWu-0007aX-E7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:54386) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYDWp-0007a5-CB for 21413@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 09:29:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [188.22.235.126] ([188.22.235.126]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSdNs-1Z8oNM1gyy-00RYmq; Sat, 05 Sep 2015 15:29:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NhjMCg33VlyaV2zPmEAHQsqBLEv/2rTp9zM9RC0sEAPShW+g9Jc Z9SktCnVov2eP9/Uy8yDgDEoZlfqmqU6sCMble7yRn8M9cZyRtD0v4pceZprCEeqHLu8ucn pLpWO0m+F4EwKV/hRc/MtFN22L2CWThjdUERRLKYqC2yVDIex51P95q3DI5a3SFuy0j2rv8 Vln10w8GMM29Zy+77Fgqw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:276WP+hGq4Q=:3AB4Y0oByfehmpUCUlAXlC LDkvhmySZacFv1MSpPYxC4hM9ijh4eN6eh3hdgxdnHOC8nT0Mlak8Zpj3JNO/X+a6d2HAOrxt nmY4hi7m9t6kGUSeh9vyxVfITo1Xbd58A8PpkQ8XTLuR2xGWkWQSpD7/OJdLgmrvlHjag0ajU gzJCgKewAh4GSmpoil6c6tWYAbcziZk5llh+L46xr2XbcSVIRVX38nE1Q8AqedZfc3iByAlja v3sompaHInu5YkKKCoHcXl6M3TZ5Wp+2SmJDhWEs2yV/SQ8O+mAqE6vVy7Iv00oMyC2oWuYFE KH7mB0NzEb//jIMB4UJi0iWDPPUf9w7Z1tyfz7UylZc6ceWztPc6pS1NKY306sIFOQHs8XSe0 RYXv1rTeF6AxqWHo6JZZfjYS9s/jBAdNXze1OMQv4CC1Bjdw5u01pW5y0+0jplrmmnZ/bmFKV hzX+0Wx9y0rAxVfZQLgwfV1jNQ3W2Sh0JSvH4SEuCOXFbKloNzWpMXmoqP9EdYjAT4T3cTaLo K9dlP7HSxQbHdlkvFPnBQ6uHJhUletXILZOHdT4TuRT0Ir454oWI8t0IVi3aysWtYPT3Q54M0 U/Vj1t6uf1/FEn6ZWlpmhwYrT4OS1y6dslWPrKBGYEN3WxTW16f73DZJDttJKXmpYK5Ep0ORS GJSnvzDiDVO8/IGFB6WeDFkaUHlFKqKR7gbPOmfsvzHgA9CiS77mnygNmtFjwX+zOn+4gTd+F 63o7mOQRAyErh3M5w7Ec0EcHSr6lQQ4M0cIsJAwl4pndEVH3/5zsvMqHY+X5gZWrzpmQBWgi X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106174 Archived-At: > I was not able to find the functions frame-geometry and frame-edges in= > emacs 24.5.1. M-x appropos found some functions which appear similar > however. Here is the results of evaluating them in a mangled frame. I see. These are not very indicative though, they mostly tell what Emacs thinks about itself. The one thing that strikes me are the values for =E2=80=98window-pixel-ed= ges=E2=80=99. IIUC you get for a "mangled" frame (2 2 598 730) and for an "unmangled" frame (2 2 598 702). Correct? If you put these frames side-by-side on your screen, do they visibly have the same height and do they both have no tool bar? In any case 730 - 2 gives a presumed height of 728 pixels for the first frame and 702 - 2 a height of 700 for the second frame. Would you say that a mangled frame's window is missing 28 pixels at the top? Anyway, could you try downloading one of the latest nightly builds from here and try with them? http://emacsformacosx.com/builds Maybe the bug has been even fixed there. Thanks, martin